Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

GFX100

Original 102MP GFX flagship with integrated vertical grip, IBIS, phase-detect AF, and 4K video.

$9,999

Released May 2019

EOS R6 Mark II is 3.5 years newer.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

5categories

GFX100

LandscapePortrait

4 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·GFX100 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 14 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 5 fps)
  • BGFX100 has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIGFX100
Resolution24.2 MP102 MP
SensorFull Frame43.8 x 32.9 mm
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps5 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop5.5-stop
Weight680 g1400 g
Battery760 shots800 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

GFX100

156 × 164 × 103 mm

1400 g (3.09 lb / 49.38 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 18mm narrower, 65mm shorter, and 15mm thinner than GFX100.

EOS R6 Mark II is 720 g lighter than GFX100.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 103mm GFX100

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

GFX100

156 × 164 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

GFX100

156 × 103 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

GFX100

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GFX100: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIGFX100
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 14 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GFX100

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 156.2, 163.6, 102.9

  • Resolution

    102 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    400 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.86 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    800 shots vs 760 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 2

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

GFX100

Pros

  • 102MP medium format sensor
  • Built-in vertical grip
  • IBIS
  • 4K video

Cons

  • Very large body
  • Expensive
  • Older AF generation

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100
Resolution
24.2 MP
102 MP4.2× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Medium Format Bayer CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
43.8 x 32.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2.4× more
5 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps8× more
5 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames12.9× more
14 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
400 Mbps+18%
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
F-Log
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
GFX100
Weight
680 g−720 g less
1400 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
156.2 × 163.6 × 102.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or GFX100?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for GFX100 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GFX100 is 102 MP, so the GFX100 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while gFX100 has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the GFX100?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. GFX100 reaches 5 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and GFX100 weighs 1400 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 720 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GFX100: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GFX100 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GFX100: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 800 shots for the GFX100, giving the GFX100 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GFX100 at $9,999. The EOS R6 Mark II is $7,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.