Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

instax WIDE Evo

Hybrid instant camera that prints Instax Wide photos and saves digital copies with film simulations.

$249

Launch price

Released Dec 2021

EOS R6 Mark II is 11 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

instax WIDE Evo

WildlifeVlogging

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·instax WIDE Evo wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIinstax WIDE Evo
Resolution24.2 MP16 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight670 g285 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

instax WIDE Evo

160 × 121 × 36 mm

285 g (0.63 lb / 10.05 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 22mm narrower and 23mm shorter than instax WIDE Evo but it is also 52mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 385 g heavier than instax WIDE Evo.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 36mm instax WIDE Evo

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

instax WIDE Evo

160 × 121 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

instax WIDE Evo

160 × 36 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

instax WIDE Evo

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

instax WIDE Evo: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIinstax WIDE Evo
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

instax WIDE Evo

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 160, 121, 36

  • Weight

    285 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

instax WIDE Evo

Pros

  • Instant + digital hybrid
  • Instax Wide format
  • Film simulation modes
  • Fun and social

Cons

  • Not for serious photography
  • Film cost
  • Fixed lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
instax WIDE Evo
Resolution
24.2 MP+51%
16 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Instax Wide digital
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
instax WIDE Evo
Processor
DIGIC X
X-Processor 5
EOS R6 Mark II
instax WIDE Evo
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
instax WIDE Evo
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or instax WIDE Evo?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for instax WIDE Evo — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and instax WIDE Evo is 16 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while instax WIDE Evo does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the instax WIDE Evo?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. instax WIDE Evo reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and instax WIDE Evo weighs 285 g, so the instax WIDE Evo is 385 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. instax WIDE Evo: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. instax WIDE Evo: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the instax WIDE Evo, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and instax WIDE Evo at $249. The instax WIDE Evo is $2,250 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs instax WIDE Evo vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.