Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-M1
Small entry X-mount body with a tilting screen and 16MP X-Trans sensor.
$699
Released Jun 2013
EOS R6 Mark II is 9.4 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-M1
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 10 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 5.6 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
X-M1
117 × 67 × 39 mm
330 g (0.73 lb / 11.64 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 22mm wider, 32mm taller, and 49mm thicker than X-M1.
EOS R6 Mark II is 350 g heavier than X-M1.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 39mm X-M1
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
X-M1
117 × 67 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
X-M1
117 × 39 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-M1
23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
368 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-M1
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 5.6 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-M1
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 116.9, 66.5, 39
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
330 g vs 680 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-M1
Pros
- ✓Very compact
- ✓Tilting LCD
- ✓X-Trans sensor
Cons
- –No built-in EVF
- –Old AF
- –No 4K
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or X-M1?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for X-M1 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-M1?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-M1 is 16.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-M1 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-M1 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-M1?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-M1 reaches 5.6 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-M1?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X-M1 weighs 330 g, so the X-M1 is 350 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-M1 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-M1: Full HD.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-M1 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-M1: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the X-M1, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-M1 at $699. The X-M1 is $1,800 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.