Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X-T1

Original weather-sealed X-T body with a large EVF and analog control layout.

$1,299

Released Jan 2014

EOS R6 Mark II is 8.8 years newer.

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

X-T1

Travel

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·X-T1 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 8 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 6,400)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 8 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIX-T1
Resolution24.2 MP16.3 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,4006,400
Burst40 fps8 fps
4K60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g440 g
Battery760 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

X-T1

129 × 90 × 47 mm

440 g (0.97 lb / 15.52 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 9mm wider, 9mm taller, and 42mm thicker than X-T1.

EOS R6 Mark II is 240 g heavier than X-T1.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 47mm X-T1

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

X-T1

129 × 90 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

X-T1

129 × 47 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

X-T1

23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

368 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-T1

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIX-T1
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 8 frames — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 36 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-T1

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129, 89.8, 46.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    440 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.77 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

X-T1

Pros

  • Classic X-T design
  • Weather sealed
  • Large EVF

Cons

  • 16MP sensor
  • No 4K
  • Old AF

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
X-T1
Resolution
24.2 MP+48%
16.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.6 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T1
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T1
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+50%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps5× more
8 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames22.5× more
8 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T1
Max resolution
4K UHD
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps9.4× more
36 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
None
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
X-T1
Weight
680 g
440 g−240 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
129 × 89.8 × 46.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T1?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for X-T1 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T1?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-T1 is 16.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T1 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T1 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T1?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T1 reaches 8 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T1?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X-T1 weighs 440 g, so the X-T1 is 240 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T1 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T1: Full HD.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T1 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T1: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the X-T1, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T1 at $1,299. The X-T1 is $1,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.