Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-T100
Entry SLR-style X-mount body with 24MP APS-C sensor, EVF, and three-way tilting LCD.
$599
Launch priceReleased May 2018
EOS R6 Mark II is 4.5 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-T100
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 10 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 6 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-T100
121 × 83 × 47 mm
448 g (0.99 lb / 15.80 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 17mm wider, 15mm taller, and 41mm thicker than X-T100.
EOS R6 Mark II is 222 g heavier than X-T100.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 47mm X-T100
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T100
121 × 83 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T100
121 × 47 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-T100
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-T100
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-T100
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 121, 83, 47.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Weight
448 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 24.2 MP
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-T100
Pros
- ✓Built-in EVF
- ✓24MP APS-C
- ✓Great battery life
Cons
- –4K limited to 15p
- –Entry AF
- –No IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T100 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-T100
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T100?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for X-T100 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T100?
Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T100 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-T100 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T100?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T100 reaches 6 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T100?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and X-T100 weighs 448 g, so the X-T100 is 222 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T100 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T100: 4K up to 15p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T100 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T100: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 430 shots for the X-T100, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T100 at $599. The X-T100 is $1,900 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs X-T100 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.