Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-T2
Weather-sealed X-T flagship that brought 24MP X-Trans III and serious 4K to Fujifilm.
$1,599
Launch priceReleased Jul 2016
EOS R6 Mark II is 6.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-T2
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 27 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 14 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-T2
133 × 92 × 49 mm
507 g (1.12 lb / 17.88 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 6mm wider, 7mm taller, and 39mm thicker than X-T2.
EOS R6 Mark II is 163 g heavier than X-T2.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 49mm X-T2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T2
133 × 92 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T2
133 × 49 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-T2
23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
368 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-T2
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -1 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 27 frames — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 14 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-T2
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132.5, 91.8, 49.2
Weight
507 g vs 670 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.77 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Resolution
24.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 2
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-T2
Pros
- ✓Weather sealed
- ✓24MP X-Trans III
- ✓4K video
- ✓Dual card slots
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –Older AF
- –Needs grip for best video
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T2 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-T2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T2?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 4.5/10 for X-T2 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T2?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-T2 is 24.3 MP, so the X-T2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T2 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-T2 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T2?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T2 reaches 14 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T2?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and X-T2 weighs 507 g, so the X-T2 is 163 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T2 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T2: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T2 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 340 shots for the X-T2, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T2 at $1,599. The X-T2 is $900 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs X-T2 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.