Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X-T50
40MP compact X-T body with flagship processor and film dials.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased Jun 2024
X-T50 is 1.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X-T50
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 66 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 305 shots)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-T50
124 × 84 × 49 mm
438 g (0.97 lb / 15.45 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 15mm wider, 14mm taller, and 40mm thicker than X-T50.
EOS R6 Mark II is 232 g heavier than X-T50.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 49mm X-T50
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T50
124 × 84 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-T50
124 × 49 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X-T50
23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C
369 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-T50
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 66 frames — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
760 shots vs 305 shots — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 425 — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-T50
Subject recognition
Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 123.8, 84, 48.8
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Card types
Adds SDXC V90
Resolution
40.2 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Weight
438 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Max video bit rate
360 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X-T50
Pros
- ✓40MP in compact body
- ✓Film dial
- ✓Modern AF
Cons
- –Small grip
- –Battery life
- –Premium for size
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T50 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X-T50
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or X-T50?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for X-T50 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T50?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-T50 is 40.2 MP, so the X-T50 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T50 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-T50 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-T50?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-T50 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T50?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and X-T50 weighs 438 g, so the X-T50 is 232 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T50 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-T50: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-T50 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-T50: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 305 shots for the X-T50, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-T50 at $1,499. The X-T50 is $1,000 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs X-T50 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.