Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

GoPro

MISSION 1

Compact cinema camera with the same 50MP 1-inch sensor and GP3 processor as MISSION 1 PRO, capped at 8K30 / 4K120 with Open Gate 4:3 and GP-Log2 10-bit.

$600

Launch price

Released May 2026

MISSION 1 is 3.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

MISSION 1

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·MISSION 1 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has lower AF low-light limit (-6.5 EV vs 0 EV)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF frame coverage (100 % vs 0 %)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • BMISSION 1 has higher Resolution (50 MP vs 24.2 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIMISSION 1
Resolution24.2 MP50 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop7-stop
Weight670 g580 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

MISSION 1

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm wider, 7mm taller, and 16mm thicker than MISSION 1.

EOS R6 Mark II is 90 g heavier than MISSION 1.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 72mm MISSION 1

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

MISSION 1

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

MISSION 1

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

MISSION 1

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

MISSION 1: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIMISSION 1
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
7.5Good
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 0 % — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

MISSION 1

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Resolution

    50 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • Weight

    580 g vs 670 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

MISSION 1

Pros

  • Same 50MP 1-inch sensor as PRO
  • 8K30 + 4K120 + Open Gate 4:3
  • GP-Log2 10-bit + rugged 20m waterproof
  • Ultra-compact cinema form factor
  • Full GoPro mount ecosystem

Cons

  • No 8K60 or 4K240 high frame rates
  • No 1080p960 burst slo-mo
  • Fixed lens only
  • Still premium vs traditional action cams

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and MISSION 1 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
MISSION 1
Resolution
24.2 MP
50 MP2.1× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
MISSION 1
Processor
DIGIC X
GP3
EOS R6 Mark II
MISSION 1
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
MISSION 1
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or MISSION 1?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for MISSION 1 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and MISSION 1?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and MISSION 1 is 50 MP, so the MISSION 1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and MISSION 1 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while MISSION 1 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the MISSION 1?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. MISSION 1 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and MISSION 1?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and MISSION 1 weighs 580 g, so the MISSION 1 is 90 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and MISSION 1 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. MISSION 1: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and MISSION 1 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. MISSION 1: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the MISSION 1, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and MISSION 1 at $600. The MISSION 1 is $1,899 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs MISSION 1 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and GoPro press materials.