Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Hasselblad

907X 50C

Modular medium format digital back for Hasselblad V-system and 907X body.

$6,399

Released Jun 2020

EOS R6 Mark II is 2.4 years newer.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

3categories

907X 50C

WildlifeLandscape

5 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·907X 50C wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 117)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • B907X 50C has higher Resolution (50 MP vs 24.2 MP)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark II907X 50C
Resolution24.2 MP50 MP
SensorFull Frame43.8 × 32.9 mm
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop7-stop
Weight680 g720 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

907X 50C

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II and 907X 50C share virtually identical body dimensions.

EOS R6 Mark II is 40 g lighter than 907X 50C.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 88mm 907X 50C

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

907X 50C

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

907X 50C

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

907X 50C

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

1.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

907X 50C: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark II907X 50C
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 117 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

907X 50C

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Resolution

    50 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    64 vs 100 — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

907X 50C

Pros

  • 50MP medium format
  • Modular V-system
  • Iconic design

Cons

  • Slow workflow
  • Expensive
  • Not for action

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X 50C at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
907X 50C
Resolution
24.2 MP
50 MP2.1× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Medium Format CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
43.8 × 32.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
907X 50C
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast-detect AF
AF points / zones
10539× more
117
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-2 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R6 Mark II
907X 50C
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+50%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2× more
20 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames+50%
120 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
907X 50C
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
907X 50C
Weight
680 g−40 g less
720 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
138 × 98 × 88 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or 907X 50C?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 6.0/10 for 907X 50C — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X 50C?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and 907X 50C is 50 MP, so the 907X 50C captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X 50C have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while 907X 50C has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the 907X 50C?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. 907X 50C reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X 50C?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and 907X 50C weighs 720 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 40 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X 50C record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. 907X 50C: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and 907X 50C weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. 907X 50C: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the 907X 50C, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and 907X 50C at $6,399. The EOS R6 Mark II is $3,900 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Hasselblad press materials.