Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Leica

SL3-S

Fast 24.6MP L-mount hybrid with 6K open-gate video, 30fps burst, and 5-axis stabilization.

$5,295

Released Jan 2025

SL3-S is 2.2 years newer.

Wins

6categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

5categories

SL3-S

Video & HybridLandscape

4 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 3 categories·SL3-S wins 2 categories
  • BSL3-S has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BSL3-S has higher ISO max (native) (200,000 vs 102,400)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 7 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 5 stops)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IISL3-S
Resolution24.2 MP24.6 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,400200,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight680 g768 g
Battery760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

SL3-S

141 × 108 × 83 mm

768 g (1.69 lb / 27.09 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 3mm narrower and 10mm shorter than SL3-S but it is also 6mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 88 g lighter than SL3-S.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 83mm SL3-S

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

SL3-S

141 × 108 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

SL3-S

141 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

SL3-S

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

SL3-S

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IISL3-S
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 7 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 779 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

SL3-S

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.2, 108, 82.7

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    200,000 vs 102,400 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

SL3-S

Pros

  • 6K open-gate video
  • 30fps electronic burst
  • 24.6MP full-frame
  • CFexpress plus SD

Cons

  • Lower resolution than SL3
  • Large body
  • Premium price

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.6 MP+2%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Phase detection AF + contrast AF
AF points / zones
1053+35%
779
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+71%
7 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps+33%
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
Max resolution
4K UHD
6K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps+70%
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
L-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264, Apple ProRes
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
Weight
680 g−88 g less
768 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
141.2 × 108 × 82.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 5.5/10 for SL3-S — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and SL3-S is 24.6 MP, so the SL3-S captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while sL3-S has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. SL3-S reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and SL3-S weighs 768 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 88 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. SL3-S: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. SL3-S: Yes.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and SL3-S at $5,295. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,796 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Leica press materials.