Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Leica

SL3-S

Fast 24.6MP L-mount hybrid with 6K open-gate video, 30fps burst, and 5-axis stabilization.

$5,295

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

SL3-S is 2.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

5categories

SL3-S

Video & HybridLandscape

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 3 categories·SL3-S wins 2 categories
  • BSL3-S has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • BSL3-S has higher ISO max (native) (200,000 vs 102,400)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 7 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 5 stops)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IISL3-S
Resolution24.2 MP24.6 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,400200,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight670 g768 g
Battery760 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

SL3-S

141 × 108 × 83 mm

768 g (1.69 lb / 27.09 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 3mm narrower and 10mm shorter than SL3-S but it is also 6mm thicker.

EOS R6 Mark II is 98 g lighter than SL3-S.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 83mm SL3-S

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3-S

141 × 108 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

SL3-S

141 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

SL3-S

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

SL3-S

Leica L

80+

native lenses available

30 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IISL3-S
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 7 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 779 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

SL3-S

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.2, 108, 82.7

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    200,000 vs 102,400 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

SL3-S

Pros

  • 6K open-gate video
  • 30fps electronic burst
  • 24.6MP full-frame
  • CFexpress plus SD

Cons

  • Lower resolution than SL3
  • Large body
  • Premium price

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.6 MP+2%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full-frame BSI CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36 x 24 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
Processor
DIGIC X
Maestro IV
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
ISO min (native)
100
50−50 less
ISO max (native)
102,400
200,000+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
200,000
EOS R6 Mark II
SL3-S
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical focal-plane + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, EOS R6 Mark II or SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for SL3-S — 670g — manageable for travel.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and SL3-S is 24.6 MP, so the SL3-S captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while SL3-S has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. SL3-S reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and SL3-S weighs 768 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 98 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. SL3-S: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and SL3-S weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. SL3-S: Yes.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and SL3-S at $5,295. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,796 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs SL3-S vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Leica press materials.