Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Nikon

Z fc

Retro APS-C Z camera with dial controls and compact style.

$999

Released Jun 2021

EOS R6 Mark II is 1.4 years newer.

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

Z fc

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Z fc wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 209)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 300 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIZ fc
Resolution24.2 MP20.9 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight680 g390 g
Battery760 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Z fc

135 × 94 × 44 mm

390 g (0.86 lb / 13.76 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm wider, 5mm taller, and 45mm thicker than Z fc.

EOS R6 Mark II is 290 g heavier than Z fc.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 44mm Z fc

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Z fc

135 × 94 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Z fc

135 × 44 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Z fc

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Z fc

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIZ fc
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4.5 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 209 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Birds, Horses, Cars…

Reasons to choose

Z fc

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264/AVC

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.5, 93.5, 43.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    390 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.02 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Z fc

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Compact
  • Good JPEG

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Older sensor
  • Limited grip

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Z fc
Resolution
24.2 MP+16%
20.9 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
DX-format CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 × 15.7 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Z fc
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Hybrid AF (phase-detect + contrast-detect)
AF points / zones
10535× more
209
AF frame coverage
100 %+15%
87 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
People, Dogs, Cats
EOS R6 Mark II
Z fc
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+9%
11 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps3.6× more
11 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Z fc
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264/AVC
EOS R6 Mark II
Z fc
Weight
680 g
390 g−290 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
134.5 × 93.5 × 43.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or Z fc?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Z fc — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Z fc?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Z fc is 20.9 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Z fc have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while z fc does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Z fc?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Z fc reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Z fc?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Z fc weighs 390 g, so the Z fc is 290 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Z fc record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Z fc: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Z fc weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Z fc: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 300 shots for the Z fc, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Z fc at $999. The Z fc is $1,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.