Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Panasonic

Lumix S1R

47MP L-mount resolution body for detail work.

$3,699

Released Feb 2019

EOS R6 Mark II is 3.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

3categories

Lumix S1R

PortraitLandscape

5 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Lumix S1R wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 225)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 40 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 9 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix S1R
Resolution24.2 MP47.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps9 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop6-stop
Weight680 g1020 g
Battery760 shots380 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Lumix S1R

149 × 110 × 97 mm

1020 g (2.25 lb / 35.98 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 11mm narrower, 12mm shorter, and 8mm thinner than Lumix S1R.

EOS R6 Mark II is 340 g lighter than Lumix S1R.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 97mm Lumix S1R

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Lumix S1R

149 × 110 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Lumix S1R

149 × 97 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix S1R

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix S1R: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix S1R
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 225 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 40 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 9 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Lumix S1R

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 148.9, 110, 96.7

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4, AVCHD

  • Card types

    Adds XQD

  • Resolution

    47.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix S1R

Pros

  • 47MP
  • High detail
  • L-mount

Cons

  • Contrast AF era
  • Heavy
  • Superseded

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R
Resolution
24.2 MP
47.3 MP+95%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
35mm Full-Frame CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36.0 x 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
10534.7× more
225
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+33%
9 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps4.4× more
9 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames4.5× more
40 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S1R
Weight
680 g−340 g less
1020 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
148.9 × 110 × 96.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix S1R?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for Lumix S1R — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix S1R is 47.3 MP, so the Lumix S1R captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix S1R has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix S1R?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix S1R reaches 9 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Lumix S1R weighs 1020 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 340 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix S1R: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S1R weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix S1R: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 380 shots for the Lumix S1R, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix S1R at $3,699. The EOS R6 Mark II is $1,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.