Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Panasonic

Lumix S5 IIX

Video-first full-frame body with internal ProRes and phase-detect AF.

$2,199

Released May 2023

Lumix S5 IIX is 6 months newer.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

3categories

Lumix S5 IIX

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

6 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·Lumix S5 IIX wins 1 categories
  • BLumix S5 IIX has higher Max video bit rate (800 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 370 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 5 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 779)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix S5 IIX
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight680 g740 g
Battery760 shots370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Lumix S5 IIX

134 × 102 × 90 mm

740 g (1.63 lb / 26.10 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm shorter and 2mm thinner than Lumix S5 IIX but it is also 4mm wider.

EOS R6 Mark II is 60 g lighter than Lumix S5 IIX.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 90mm Lumix S5 IIX

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Lumix S5 IIX

134 × 102 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Lumix S5 IIX

134 × 90 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix S5 IIX

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix S5 IIX: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix S5 IIX
Portrait
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent

The verdict

The $300 price gap separates the Canon EOS R6 Mark II's 40 fps burst speed from the Panasonic Lumix S5 IIX's 6K video resolution.

Choose the Canon EOS R6 Mark II if you photograph fast action, as it delivers a 40 fps electronic burst rate to capture split-second moments. This speed is paired with 6,072 autofocus points that include bird and vehicle recognition for precise subject tracking.

Choose the Panasonic Lumix S5 IIX if you are a filmmaker requiring high-fidelity production, as it offers Apple ProRes 422 HQ recording at bitrates up to 800Mbps. This model also includes a full-size HDMI port for reliable external monitoring at a lower $2,199 price.

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 370 shots — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix S5 IIX

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.3, 102.3, 90.1

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, MOV…

  • Max video bit rate

    800 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds USB-SSD

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix S5 IIX

Pros

  • Internal Apple ProRes 422 HQ recording
  • First Lumix with phase-detect AF
  • 6K open gate video (3:2 full-sensor)
  • 4K 120p slow-motion

Cons

  • 24.2MP limits still resolution vs. A7 IV
  • AF still trails Canon/Sony in tracking speed
  • Large body for 24MP

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S5 IIX
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
35mm Full-Frame CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 x 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S5 IIX
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Phase Hybrid AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
1053+35%
779
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-6 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal, Car, Motorcycle
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S5 IIX
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+33%
9 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps+33%
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
200 frames+11%
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S5 IIX
Max resolution
4K UHD
6K Open Gate
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
800 Mbps2.4× more
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
V-Log / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, H.265, H.264, MOV, MP4
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix S5 IIX
Weight
680 g−60 g less
740 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
134.3 × 102.3 × 90.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix S5 IIX?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 7.5/10 for Lumix S5 IIX — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S5 IIX?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S5 IIX have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix S5 IIX has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix S5 IIX?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix S5 IIX reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S5 IIX?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Lumix S5 IIX weighs 740 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 60 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S5 IIX record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix S5 IIX: 6K Open Gate (max), 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix S5 IIX weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix S5 IIX: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 370 shots for the Lumix S5 IIX, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix S5 IIX at $2,199. The Lumix S5 IIX is $300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.