Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Ricoh

GR Digital IV

Cult compact GR Digital with 10MP CCD sensor, fast 28mm equivalent f/1.9 lens, and sensor-shift stabilization.

$599

Released Sep 2011

EOS R6 Mark II is 11.2 years newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

GR Digital IV

1 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·GR Digital IV wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • BGR Digital IV has lower Weight (219 g vs 680 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 10 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIGR Digital IV
Resolution24.2 MP10 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.7 inch
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst40 fps1.54 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight680 g219 g
Battery760 shots390 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

GR Digital IV

109 × 60 × 33 mm

219 g (0.48 lb / 7.73 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 30mm wider, 39mm taller, and 56mm thicker than GR Digital IV.

EOS R6 Mark II is 461 g heavier than GR Digital IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 33mm GR Digital IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

GR Digital IV

109 × 60 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

GR Digital IV

109 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR Digital IV: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIGR Digital IV
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 10 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR Digital IV

  • Codecs

    Adds Motion JPEG AVI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 108.6, 59.8, 32.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, Eye-Fi

  • Weight

    219 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

GR Digital IV

Pros

  • Fast f/1.9 GR lens
  • CCD rendering
  • Compact classic
  • Sensor-shift stabilization

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • VGA video only
  • Very old model

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Resolution
24.2 MP2.4× more
10 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/1.7" CCD
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/1.7 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Hybrid AF
AF points / zones
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps7.8× more
1.54 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps26× more
1.54 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Max resolution
4K UHD
VGA
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
Motion JPEG AVI
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Weight
680 g
219 g−461 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
108.6 × 59.8 × 32.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 0.5/10 for GR Digital IV — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GR Digital IV is 10 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while gR Digital IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. GR Digital IV reaches 1.54 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and GR Digital IV weighs 219 g, so the GR Digital IV is 461 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GR Digital IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GR Digital IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 390 shots for the GR Digital IV, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GR Digital IV at $599. The GR Digital IV is $1,900 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.