Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Ricoh

GR Digital IV

Cult compact GR Digital with 10MP CCD sensor, fast 28mm equivalent f/1.9 lens, and sensor-shift stabilization.

$599

Launch price

Released Sep 2011

EOS R6 Mark II is 11.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

GR Digital IV

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·GR Digital IV wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • BGR Digital IV has lower Weight (219 g vs 670 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 10 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIGR Digital IV
Resolution24.2 MP10 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.7 inch
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst40 fps1.54 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight670 g219 g
Battery760 shots390 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR Digital IV

109 × 60 × 33 mm

219 g (0.48 lb / 7.73 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 30mm wider, 39mm taller, and 56mm thicker than GR Digital IV.

EOS R6 Mark II is 451 g heavier than GR Digital IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 33mm GR Digital IV

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR Digital IV

109 × 60 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR Digital IV

109 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR Digital IV: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIGR Digital IV
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 10 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR Digital IV

  • Codecs

    Adds Motion JPEG AVI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 108.6, 59.8, 32.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, Eye-Fi

  • Weight

    219 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

GR Digital IV

Pros

  • Fast f/1.9 GR lens
  • CCD rendering
  • Compact classic
  • Sensor-shift stabilization

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • VGA video only
  • Very old model

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Resolution
24.2 MP2.4× more
10 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/1.7" CCD
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/1.7 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Aperture
F1.9-F9
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Processor
DIGIC X
GR ENGINE IV
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
102,400+5 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
3,200
EOS R6 Mark II
GR Digital IV
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR Digital IV — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GR Digital IV is 10 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR Digital IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. GR Digital IV reaches 1.54 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and GR Digital IV weighs 219 g, so the GR Digital IV is 451 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GR Digital IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GR Digital IV weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GR Digital IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 390 shots for the GR Digital IV, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GR Digital IV at $599. The GR Digital IV is $1,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs GR Digital IV vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.