Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
GR IV Monochrome

Ricoh

GR IV Monochrome

Monochrome-only GR IV with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, red filter mode, 5-axis SR, and classic 28mm pocket street-camera design.

$2,199

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

GR IV Monochrome is 3.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

3categories

GR IV Monochrome

PortraitVlogging

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·GR IV Monochrome wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
  • BGR IV Monochrome has higher ISO max (native) (409,600 vs 102,400)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 250 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIGR IV Monochrome
Resolution24.2 MP25.74 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,400409,600
Burst40 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stopYes
Weight670 g262 g
Battery760 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IV Monochrome front view

GR IV Monochrome

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 29mm wider, 37mm taller, and 56mm thicker than GR IV Monochrome.

EOS R6 Mark II is 408 g heavier than GR IV Monochrome.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 33mm GR IV Monochrome

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IV Monochrome back view

GR IV Monochrome

109 × 61 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

GR IV Monochrome top view

GR IV Monochrome

109 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

GR IV Monochrome

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

2.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR IV Monochrome: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIGR IV Monochrome
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR IV Monochrome

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    409,600 vs 102,400 — higher is better

  • Weight

    262 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    25.74 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

GR IV Monochrome

Pros

  • Monochrome APS-C sensor
  • ISO 160-409600
  • 5-axis SR
  • Red filter mode

Cons

  • Black-and-white only
  • Fixed lens
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV Monochrome at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
GR IV Monochrome
Resolution
24.2 MP
25.74 MP+6%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C Monochrome CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IV Monochrome
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IV Monochrome
Processor
DIGIC X
GR ENGINE 7
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IV Monochrome
ISO min (native)
100−60 less
160
ISO max (native)
102,400
409,600+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
409,600
EOS R6 Mark II
GR IV Monochrome
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or GR IV Monochrome?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for GR IV Monochrome — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV Monochrome?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and GR IV Monochrome is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV Monochrome captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV Monochrome have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR IV Monochrome has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the GR IV Monochrome?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. GR IV Monochrome reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV Monochrome?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and GR IV Monochrome weighs 262 g, so the GR IV Monochrome is 408 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV Monochrome record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. GR IV Monochrome: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and GR IV Monochrome weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. GR IV Monochrome: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 250 shots for the GR IV Monochrome, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and GR IV Monochrome at $2,199. The GR IV Monochrome is $300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs GR IV Monochrome vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.