Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

Alpha 6600

APS-C with IBIS and huge NP-FZ100 battery in a compact body.

$1,399

Released Oct 2019

EOS R6 Mark II is 3.1 years newer.

Wins

13categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

2categories

Alpha 6600

TravelPortrait

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Alpha 6600 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 6600
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40032,000
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight680 g503 g
Battery760 shots810 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Alpha 6600

120 × 67 × 69 mm

503 g (1.11 lb / 17.74 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 18mm wider, 32mm taller, and 19mm thicker than Alpha 6600.

EOS R6 Mark II is 177 g heavier than Alpha 6600.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 69mm Alpha 6600

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Alpha 6600

120 × 67 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Alpha 6600

120 × 69 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 6600

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 6600

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 6600
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Travel
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6600

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 120, 66.9, 69.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • Weight

    503 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    810 shots vs 760 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 6600

Pros

  • IBIS in APS-C
  • Excellent battery
  • Real-time tracking AF

Cons

  • Older than A6700
  • Single slot
  • No 4K 60p

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 6600 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 6600
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C Exmor CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 6600
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-2 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 6600
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+9%
11 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps3.6× more
11 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames3× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 6600
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Log2 / S-Log3 / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC S, AVCHD, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 6600
Weight
680 g
503 g−177 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
120 × 66.9 × 69.3 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 6600?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for Alpha 6600 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 6600?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 6600 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 6600 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 6600?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 6600 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 6600?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Alpha 6600 weighs 503 g, so the Alpha 6600 is 177 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 6600 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 6600: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 6600 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 6600: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 810 shots for the Alpha 6600, giving the Alpha 6600 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 6600 at $1,399. The Alpha 6600 is $1,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.