Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

Alpha 7C

Smallest full-frame E-mount body with A7 III performance in a travel-friendly package.

$1,799

Released Sep 2020

EOS R6 Mark II is 2.2 years newer.

Wins

14categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

1categories

Alpha 7C

TravelPortrait

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Alpha 7C wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7C
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps10 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight680 g509 g
Battery760 shots740 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Alpha 7C

124 × 71 × 60 mm

509 g (1.12 lb / 17.95 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 14mm wider, 27mm taller, and 29mm thicker than Alpha 7C.

EOS R6 Mark II is 171 g heavier than Alpha 7C.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 60mm Alpha 7C

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Alpha 7C

124 × 71 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Alpha 7C

124 × 60 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 7C

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7C

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7C
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Travel
7.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7C

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 124, 71.1, 59.7

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • Weight

    509 g vs 680 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 7C

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 5-axis IBIS
  • 24MP hybrid
  • Great for travel

Cons

  • Small grip
  • Single card slot
  • Superseded by A7C II

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7C
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7C
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
1053+52%
693
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7C
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+20%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps4× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames3× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7C
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps2.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Log2 / S-Log3 / HLG
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC S, AVCHD, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7C
Weight
680 g
509 g−171 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
124 × 71.1 × 59.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 7C?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for Alpha 7C — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7C?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7C have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7C has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 7C?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 7C reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7C?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Alpha 7C weighs 509 g, so the Alpha 7C is 171 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7C record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7C: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7C weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7C: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 740 shots for the Alpha 7C, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 7C at $1,799. The Alpha 7C is $700 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.