Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Released Nov 2022
Sony
Alpha 7R III
42MP workhorse for landscape and studio before the A7R IV/V era.
$3,199
Released Oct 2017
EOS R6 Mark II is 5.1 years newer.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
Alpha 7R III
3 categories tied
Check current prices
Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 32,000)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 399)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)
Alpha 7R III
127 × 96 × 74 mm
657 g (1.45 lb / 23.18 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 3mm taller, and 15mm thicker than Alpha 7R III.
EOS R6 Mark II is 23 g heavier than Alpha 7R III.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 74mm Alpha 7R III
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Alpha 7R III
127 × 96 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Alpha 7R III
127 × 74 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Alpha 7R III
35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame
862 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
Alpha 7R III
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 32,000 — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 399 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
Alpha 7R III
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 126.9, 95.6, 73.7
Codecs
Adds XAVC S, AVCHD
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Resolution
42.4 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Weight
657 g vs 680 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓In-body stabilization — Both support in-body stabilization
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
Alpha 7R III
Pros
- ✓42MP proven
- ✓10fps with AF
- ✓Dual slots
- ✓Great used value
Cons
- –Superseded
- –No 8K
- –Older AF
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 7R III?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 3.5/10 for Alpha 7R III — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R III?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Alpha 7R III is 42.4 MP, so the Alpha 7R III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R III have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 7R III has 5.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 7R III?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 7R III reaches 10 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R III?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Alpha 7R III weighs 657 g, so the Alpha 7R III is 23 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R III record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7R III: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7R III weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7R III: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 650 shots for the Alpha 7R III, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 7R III at $3,199. The EOS R6 Mark II is $700 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.