Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
Alpha 9

Sony

Alpha 9

First stacked-sensor mirrorless sports camera with 20fps blackout-free shooting.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Apr 2017

EOS R6 Mark II is 5.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

Alpha 9

PortraitTravel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Alpha 9 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 5 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 20 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 9
Resolution24.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst40 fps20 fps
4K60 fps29.97 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight670 g673 g
Battery760 shots650 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 9 front view

Alpha 9

127 × 96 × 63 mm

673 g (1.48 lb / 23.74 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 3mm taller, and 25mm thicker than Alpha 9.

EOS R6 Mark II is 3 g lighter than Alpha 9.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 63mm Alpha 9

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 back view

Alpha 9

127 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 top view

Alpha 9

127 × 63 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 9

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 9

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 9
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Landscape
7.0Good
7.0Good
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD, MP4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.9, 95.6, 63

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC…

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ResolutionBoth 24.2 MP
  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 9

Pros

  • Stacked sensor pioneer
  • 20fps silent burst
  • Pro sports AF

Cons

  • Superseded by A9 II/III
  • 24MP
  • Expensive when new

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 x 23.8
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ X
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
204,800
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 9
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 9?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for Alpha 9 — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9?

Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 9 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 9?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 9 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Alpha 9 weighs 673 g, so the EOS R6 Mark II is 3 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 9: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 9 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 9: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 650 shots for the Alpha 9, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 9 at $4,499. The EOS R6 Mark II is $2,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Alpha 9 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.