Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

OM System

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Compact pro MFT with IBIS and weather sealing.

$1,199

Released Oct 2019

EOS R6 Mark III is 6.1 years newer.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

3categories

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Sports & ActionWildlife

6 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 5 categories·OM-D E-M5 Mark III wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIOM-D E-M5 Mark III
Resolution32.5 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stop6-stop
Weight699 g580 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 4mm wider, 7mm taller, and 16mm thicker than OM-D E-M5 Mark III.

EOS R6 Mark III is 119 g heavier than OM-D E-M5 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 72mm OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIOM-D E-M5 Mark III
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Weight

    580 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

OM-D E-M5 Mark III

Pros

  • Compact pro
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS

Cons

  • Older
  • MFT
  • Superseded

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M5 Mark III at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Resolution
32.5 MP+59%
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Cross-type PDAF
AF points / zones
1053
1053
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.7× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames2.5× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
OM-D E-M5 Mark III
Weight
699 g
580 g−119 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
134 × 91 × 72 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark III or OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for OM-D E-M5 Mark III — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and OM-D E-M5 Mark III is 20.4 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M5 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-D E-M5 Mark III has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. OM-D E-M5 Mark III reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M5 Mark III?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and OM-D E-M5 Mark III weighs 580 g, so the OM-D E-M5 Mark III is 119 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M5 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. OM-D E-M5 Mark III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and OM-D E-M5 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. OM-D E-M5 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M5 Mark III, giving the OM-D E-M5 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and OM-D E-M5 Mark III at $1,199. The OM-D E-M5 Mark III is $1,600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and OM System press materials.