Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
Sony
PXW-Z300
Flagship 3-CMOS XDCAM with 1/2-inch Exmor R sensors, 17x f/1.9 zoom, AI subject AF, 4K60p, flexible LCD arm, and content authentication.
$8,298
Launch priceReleased Oct 2025
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
PXW-Z300
5 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Resolution (32.5 MP vs 8.3 MP)
- BPXW-Z300 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 3,690,000)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 759)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 30 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PXW-Z300
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 4mm wider, 7mm taller, and 16mm thicker than PXW-Z300.
EOS R6 Mark III is 119 g heavier than PXW-Z300.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 72mm PXW-Z300
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PXW-Z300
134 × 91 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
PXW-Z300
134 × 72 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
PXW-Z300
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
PXW-Z300: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 600 Mbps — higher is better
Resolution
32.5 MP vs 8.3 MP — higher is better
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S
AF points / zones
1053 vs 759 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
PXW-Z300
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134, 91, 72
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 3,690,000 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds ProRes
RAW buffer depth
200 frames vs 150 frames — higher is better
Weight
580 g vs 699 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 12 fps
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
PXW-Z300
Pros
- ✓3× 1/2-inch 4K Exmor R 3CMOS
- ✓17x f/1.9 constant aperture zoom
- ✓AI subject recognition + auto framing
- ✓4K60p XAVC Intra/Long + MPEG HD422
- ✓Electronic variable ND + 12G-SDI
Cons
- –Premium flagship pricing
- –3CMOS not single large sensor
- –Heavy at 2.6 kg body-only
- –New platform learning curve
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and PXW-Z300 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
Sony PXW-Z300
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark III or PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for PXW-Z300 — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and PXW-Z300 is 8.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and PXW-Z300 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z300 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. PXW-Z300 reaches 30 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and PXW-Z300?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and PXW-Z300 weighs 580 g, so the PXW-Z300 is 119 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and PXW-Z300 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. PXW-Z300: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and PXW-Z300 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. PXW-Z300: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 520 shots for the PXW-Z300, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and PXW-Z300 at $8,298. The EOS R6 Mark III is $5,499 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs PXW-Z300 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.