Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released May 2026

vs
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

2016 ultracompact pocket camera with 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS, 12x 25–300mm OIS zoom, Full HD video, and Wi-Fi/NFC.

$210

Launch price

Released Jan 2016

EOS R6 V is 10.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 V

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

2categories

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 V wins 5 categories·PowerShot ELPH 360 HS wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 V has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 7.2 fps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 2.5 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 VPowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Resolution32.5 MP20.2 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 × 4.55 mm
ISO max64,0003,200
Burst40 fps7.2 fps
4K120 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight688 g147 g
Battery640 shots180 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS front view

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

100 × 58 × 23 mm

147 g (0.32 lb / 5.19 oz)

EOS R6 V is 42mm wider, 25mm taller, and 57mm thicker than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS.

EOS R6 V is 541 g heavier than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 23mm PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

100 × 58 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

100 × 23 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 V

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 VPowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 7.2 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 2.5 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264 (MP4)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 100, 58, 23

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    147 g vs 688 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Pros

  • True pocket ultracompact (147g)
  • 12x 25–300mm optical zoom
  • Hybrid Auto + Creative Shot modes
  • Wi-Fi + NFC
  • SD card slot (not microSD)

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Full HD only (no 4K)
  • Fixed non-touch LCD
  • Discontinued (superseded by HS A)
  • Legacy Mini-USB port

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 V and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 V
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Resolution
32.5 MP+61%
20.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/2.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
6.17 × 4.55 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 V
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Aperture
f/3.6–7.0
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
25–300 mm
EOS R6 V
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC 4+
EOS R6 V
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
64,000+4.3 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R6 V
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Shutter type
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 V or PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 V scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for PowerShot ELPH 360 HS — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is 20.2 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 V and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot ELPH 360 HS does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS reaches 7.2 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS weighs 147 g, so the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is 541 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 V and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS record 4K video?

EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: Full HD.

Are the EOS R6 V and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS weather sealed?

EOS R6 V: Yes. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 180 shots for the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS at $210. The PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is $2,289 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 V vs PowerShot ELPH 360 HS vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.