Canon
EOS R3
Pro 24MP full-frame stacked-sensor body built for sports, news, wildlife, and high-speed hybrid capture.
$5,999
Launch priceReleased Sep 2021
Canon
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
2016 ultracompact pocket camera with 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS, 12x 25–300mm OIS zoom, Full HD video, and Wi-Fi/NFC.
$210
Launch priceReleased Jan 2016
EOS R3 is 5.7 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R3
Wins
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R3 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R3 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
- AEOS R3 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- BPowerShot ELPH 360 HS has lower Weight (147 g vs 1015 g)
- AEOS R3 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 2.5 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareEOS R3
150 × 143 × 87 mm
1015 g (2.24 lb / 35.80 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
100 × 58 × 23 mm
147 g (0.32 lb / 5.19 oz)
EOS R3 is 50mm wider, 85mm taller, and 64mm thicker than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS.
EOS R3 is 868 g heavier than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS.
Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R3 · 23mm PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R3
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact
28 mm² area
30.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R3
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R3
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds RAW, H.265, H.264
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 150, 142.6, 87.2
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Codecs
Adds H.264 (MP4)
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 100, 58, 23
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Weight
147 g vs 1015 g — lower is better
ISO min (native)
80 vs 100 — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R3
Pros
- ✓30fps electronic burst from a stacked full-frame sensor
- ✓Exceptional low-light AF down to -7.5 EV
- ✓Integrated pro body with large LP-E19 battery
- ✓6K RAW video and 4K 120p
- ✓Rugged weather-sealed construction
Cons
- –24MP resolution trails higher-detail rivals
- –Large integrated-grip body
- –Expensive compared with enthusiast full-frame bodies
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Pros
- ✓True pocket ultracompact (147g)
- ✓12x 25–300mm optical zoom
- ✓Hybrid Auto + Creative Shot modes
- ✓Wi-Fi + NFC
- ✓SD card slot (not microSD)
Cons
- –Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
- –Full HD only (no 4K)
- –Fixed non-touch LCD
- –Discontinued (superseded by HS A)
- –Legacy Mini-USB port
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R3 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R3
Canon PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, EOS R3 or PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?
EOS R3 scores 9.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for PowerShot ELPH 360 HS — 6K video for oversampled 4K.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R3 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?
EOS R3 is 24.1 MP and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is 20.2 MP, so the EOS R3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R3 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R3 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot ELPH 360 HS does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R3 or the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?
EOS R3 reaches 30 fps electronic. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS reaches 7.2 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R3 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?
EOS R3 weighs 1015 g and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS weighs 147 g, so the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is 868 g lighter.
Do the EOS R3 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS record 4K video?
EOS R3: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: Full HD.
Are the EOS R3 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS weather sealed?
EOS R3: Yes. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 620 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R3 and 180 shots for the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS, giving the EOS R3 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R3 launched at $5,999 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS at $210. The PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is $5,789 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R3 vs PowerShot ELPH 360 HS vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.