Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Canon

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

2016 ultracompact pocket camera with 20.2MP 1/2.3-inch CMOS, 12x 25–300mm OIS zoom, Full HD video, and Wi-Fi/NFC.

$210

Launch price

Released Jan 2016

EOS R6 Mark II is 6.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 4 categories·PowerShot ELPH 360 HS wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 7.2 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 2.5 fps)
  • BPowerShot ELPH 360 HS has lower Weight (147 g vs 670 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIPowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Resolution24.2 MP20.2 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 × 4.55 mm
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst40 fps7.2 fps
4K60 fps
IBIS8-stopNo
Weight670 g147 g
Battery760 shots180 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS front view

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

100 × 58 × 23 mm

147 g (0.32 lb / 5.19 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 38mm wider, 40mm taller, and 65mm thicker than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS.

EOS R6 Mark II is 523 g heavier than PowerShot ELPH 360 HS.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 23mm PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

100 × 58 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

100 × 23 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIPowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 7.2 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 2.5 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264 (MP4)

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 100, 58, 23

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    147 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

PowerShot ELPH 360 HS

Pros

  • True pocket ultracompact (147g)
  • 12x 25–300mm optical zoom
  • Hybrid Auto + Creative Shot modes
  • Wi-Fi + NFC
  • SD card slot (not microSD)

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Full HD only (no 4K)
  • Fixed non-touch LCD
  • Discontinued (superseded by HS A)
  • Legacy Mini-USB port

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Resolution
24.2 MP+20%
20.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/2.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
6.17 × 4.55 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Aperture
f/3.6–7.0
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
25–300 mm
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC 4+
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
102,400+5 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot ELPH 360 HS
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for PowerShot ELPH 360 HS — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is 20.2 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot ELPH 360 HS does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS reaches 7.2 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS weighs 147 g, so the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is 523 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: Full HD.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. PowerShot ELPH 360 HS: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 180 shots for the PowerShot ELPH 360 HS, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and PowerShot ELPH 360 HS at $210. The PowerShot ELPH 360 HS is $2,289 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs PowerShot ELPH 360 HS vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.