Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released May 2026

vs
PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Canon

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

1-inch premium compact with pop-up EVF, 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, and 4K for travel.

$899

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

EOS R6 V is 6.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 V

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

1categories

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 V wins 5 categories·PowerShot G5 X Mark II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 120 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 1053)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher RAW buffer depth (150 frames vs 60 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 VPowerShot G5 X Mark II
Resolution32.5 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max64,00012,800
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stop6-stop
Weight688 g340 g
Battery640 shots320 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot G5 X Mark II front view

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

111 × 61 × 46 mm

340 g (0.75 lb / 11.99 oz)

EOS R6 V is 31mm wider, 22mm taller, and 34mm thicker than PowerShot G5 X Mark II.

EOS R6 V is 348 g heavier than PowerShot G5 X Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 46mm PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G5 X Mark II back view

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

111 × 61 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G5 X Mark II top view

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

111 × 46 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 V

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot G5 X Mark II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 VPowerShot G5 X Mark II
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 120 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 1053 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    150 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 110.9, 60.9, 46

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    340 g vs 688 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Pros

  • Pop-up EVF
  • 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8
  • 4K video
  • Compact premium

Cons

  • 1-inch sensor
  • Fixed lens
  • Superseded by G7 X IV

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 V and PowerShot G5 X Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 V
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Resolution
32.5 MP+62%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1"-Type CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 V
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Aperture
1.8-2.8
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24-120mm
EOS R6 V
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R6 V
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
ISO min (native)
100−25 less
125
ISO max (native)
64,000+2.3 stops
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R6 V
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Shutter type
Mechanical / Electronic 1st Curtain + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 V or PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 V scores 7.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for PowerShot G5 X Mark II — 32.5MP — ample resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 V and PowerShot G5 X Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot G5 X Mark II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot G5 X Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and PowerShot G5 X Mark II weighs 340 g, so the PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 348 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 V and PowerShot G5 X Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. PowerShot G5 X Mark II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 V and PowerShot G5 X Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R6 V: Yes. PowerShot G5 X Mark II: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 320 shots for the PowerShot G5 X Mark II, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II at $899. The PowerShot G5 X Mark II is $1,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 V vs PowerShot G5 X Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.