Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R5

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Launch price

Released Jul 2020

vs

Canon

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

1-inch premium compact with pop-up EVF, 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, and 4K for travel.

$899

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

EOS R5 is 1 year newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

Wins

3categories

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Sports & ActionVlogging

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R5 wins 4 categories·PowerShot G5 X Mark II wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R5 has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R5 has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 20.1 MP)
  • BPowerShot G5 X Mark II has lower Weight (361 g vs 738 g)
  • AEOS R5 has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R5PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Resolution45 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max51,20025,600
Burst20 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop6-stop
Weight738 g361 g
Battery490 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R5 front view

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

112 × 62 × 46 mm

361 g (0.80 lb / 12.73 oz)

EOS R5 is 27mm wider, 36mm taller, and 42mm thicker than PowerShot G5 X Mark II.

EOS R5 is 377 g heavier than PowerShot G5 X Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R5 · 46mm PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R5 back view

EOS R5

139 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

112 × 62 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R5 top view

EOS R5

139 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

112 × 46 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R5

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot G5 X Mark II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R5PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Travel
6.0Good
6.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5, 88

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112, 62, 46

  • Weight

    361 g vs 738 g — lower is better

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only PowerShot G5 X Mark II supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Pros

  • Pop-up EVF
  • 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8
  • 4K video
  • Compact premium

Cons

  • 1-inch sensor
  • Fixed lens
  • Superseded by G7 X IV

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R5 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R5
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Resolution
45 MP2.2× more
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1-inch CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R5
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R5
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+1 stop
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
EOS R5
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R5 or PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R5 scores 8.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for PowerShot G5 X Mark II — 45MP — excellent for prints up to 24×36".

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R5 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R5 is 45 MP and PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R5 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot G5 X Mark II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R5 or the PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic. PowerShot G5 X Mark II reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R5 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R5 weighs 738 g and PowerShot G5 X Mark II weighs 361 g, so the PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 377 g lighter.

Do the EOS R5 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. PowerShot G5 X Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R5 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R5: Yes. PowerShot G5 X Mark II: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 490 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R5 and 640 shots for the PowerShot G5 X Mark II, giving the PowerShot G5 X Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R5 launched at $3,899 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II at $899. The PowerShot G5 X Mark II is $3,000 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R5 vs PowerShot G5 X Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.