Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Canon

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

1-inch premium compact with pop-up EVF, 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, and 4K for travel.

$899

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

EOS R6 Mark II is 3.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Sports & ActionVlogging

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·PowerShot G5 X Mark II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIPowerShot G5 X Mark II
Resolution24.2 MP20.1 MP
SensorFull Frame13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop6-stop
Weight670 g361 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

112 × 62 × 46 mm

361 g (0.80 lb / 12.73 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 26mm wider, 36mm taller, and 42mm thicker than PowerShot G5 X Mark II.

EOS R6 Mark II is 309 g heavier than PowerShot G5 X Mark II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 46mm PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

112 × 62 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

112 × 46 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

PowerShot G5 X Mark II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIPowerShot G5 X Mark II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112, 62, 46

  • Weight

    361 g vs 670 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Pros

  • Pop-up EVF
  • 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8
  • 4K video
  • Compact premium

Cons

  • 1-inch sensor
  • Fixed lens
  • Superseded by G7 X IV

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G5 X Mark II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Resolution
24.2 MP+20%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 2.0/10 for PowerShot G5 X Mark II — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 20.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G5 X Mark II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PowerShot G5 X Mark II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. PowerShot G5 X Mark II reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G5 X Mark II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and PowerShot G5 X Mark II weighs 361 g, so the PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 309 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G5 X Mark II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. PowerShot G5 X Mark II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and PowerShot G5 X Mark II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. PowerShot G5 X Mark II: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the PowerShot G5 X Mark II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and PowerShot G5 X Mark II at $899. The PowerShot G5 X Mark II is $1,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs PowerShot G5 X Mark II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.