Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Released May 2026

vs

Ricoh

WG-8

Rugged waterproof compact with 20MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 5x 28-140mm equivalent zoom, 4K video, GPS, and macro lights.

$399

Released Jul 2024

EOS R6 V is 1.8 years newer.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 V

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

1categories

WG-8

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 V wins 4 categories·WG-8 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 9)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 6,400)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BWG-8 has lower Weight (242 g vs 688 g)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 VWG-8
Resolution32.5 MP20 MP
SensorFull Frame1/2.3 inch
ISO max64,0006,400
Burst40 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight688 g242 g
Battery640 shots340 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

WG-8

118 × 66 × 33 mm

242 g (0.53 lb / 8.54 oz)

EOS R6 V is 24mm wider, 18mm taller, and 47mm thicker than WG-8.

EOS R6 V is 446 g heavier than WG-8.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 33mm WG-8

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

WG-8

118 × 66 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

WG-8

118 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 V

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

WG-8: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 VWG-8
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 9 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

WG-8

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 118.2, 65.5, 33.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    242 g vs 688 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

WG-8

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • 4K video
  • GPS and compass
  • Macro stand included

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Limited manual control
  • No RAW focus

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 V
WG-8
Resolution
32.5 MP+63%
20 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R6 V
WG-8
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
9-point AF / spot AF / auto tracking AF
AF points / zones
6097677.4× more
9
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Horse, Vehicle, Airplane, Train
Face, Pet
EOS R6 V
WG-8
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
EOS R6 V
WG-8
Max resolution
7K RAW / 7K Open Gate
4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3
Standard profiles
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 V
WG-8
Weight
688 g
242 g−446 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
141.8 × 83.3 × 79.7 mm
118.2 × 65.5 × 33.1 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R6 V or WG-8?

EOS R6 V scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for WG-8 — 40fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and WG-8?

EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and WG-8 is 20 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 V and WG-8 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while wG-8 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and WG-8?

EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and WG-8 weighs 242 g, so the WG-8 is 446 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 V and WG-8 record 4K video?

EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. WG-8: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 V and WG-8 weather sealed?

EOS R6 V: Yes. WG-8: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 340 shots for the WG-8, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and WG-8 at $399. The WG-8 is $2,100 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.