Ricoh
WG-8
Rugged waterproof compact with 20MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 5x 28-140mm equivalent zoom, 4K video, GPS, and macro lights.
$399
Released Jul 2024
Sony
Alpha 1 II
50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.
$6,499
Released Nov 2024
Alpha 1 II is 4 months newer.
Wins
WG-8
Wins
Alpha 1 II
1 categories tied
Check current prices
Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:
As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR — Key differences
- BAlpha 1 II has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 9)
- BAlpha 1 II has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 6,400)
- BAlpha 1 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
- AWG-8 has lower Weight (242 g vs 743 g)
- BAlpha 1 II has higher Resolution (50.1 MP vs 20 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
WG-8
118 × 66 × 33 mm
242 g (0.53 lb / 8.54 oz)
Alpha 1 II
136 × 97 × 83 mm
743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)
WG-8 is 18mm narrower, 31mm shorter, and 50mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.
WG-8 is 501 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.
Depth (front-to-back): 33mm WG-8 · 83mm Alpha 1 II
Sensor size, to scale
Alpha 1 II
35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame
862 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
WG-8: mount data unavailable
Alpha 1 II
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
WG-8
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Pet
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 118.2, 65.5, 33.1
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Weight
242 g vs 743 g — lower is better
Reasons to choose
Alpha 1 II
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II
AF points / zones
759 vs 9 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
32,000 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Codecs
Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better
Resolution
50.1 MP vs 20 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Max video bit rate — Both 150 Mbps
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
WG-8
Pros
- ✓Waterproof and dustproof
- ✓4K video
- ✓GPS and compass
- ✓Macro stand included
Cons
- –Small sensor
- –Limited manual control
- –No RAW focus
Alpha 1 II
Pros
- ✓50MP stacked sensor
- ✓30fps blackout-free burst
- ✓8K 30p video
- ✓Best Sony AF
Cons
- –Very expensive
- –Complex menus
- –Large files
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the WG-8 and Alpha 1 II at major authorized retailers.
Ricoh WG-8
Sony Alpha 1 II
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, WG-8 or Alpha 1 II?
Alpha 1 II scores 9.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for WG-8 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the WG-8 and Alpha 1 II?
WG-8 is 20 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the WG-8 and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?
WG-8 does not have IBIS, while alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.
What's the weight difference between the WG-8 and Alpha 1 II?
WG-8 weighs 242 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the WG-8 is 501 g lighter.
Do the WG-8 and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?
WG-8: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.
Are the WG-8 and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?
WG-8: Yes. Alpha 1 II: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the WG-8 and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Alpha 1 II the edge.
How much does each cost?
WG-8 launched at $399 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The WG-8 is $6,100 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.
Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.