Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GR IV

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

vs

Ricoh

WG-8

Rugged waterproof compact with 20MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 5x 28-140mm equivalent zoom, 4K video, GPS, and macro lights.

$399

Launch price

Released Jul 2024

GR IV is 1.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

Wins

2categories

WG-8

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV wins 4 categories·WG-8 wins 1 categories
  • AGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 6,400)
  • AGR IV has higher AF points / zones (49 vs 9)
  • AGR IV has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AGR IV has higher 1080p max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BWG-8 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (340 shots vs 250 shots)

Key specs at a glance

GR IVWG-8
Resolution25.74 MP20 MP
SensorAPS-C1/2.3 inch
ISO max204,8006,400
Burst4 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISYesNo
Weight262 g242 g
Battery250 shots340 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV front view

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

WG-8

118 × 66 × 33 mm

242 g (0.53 lb / 8.54 oz)

GR IV is 9mm narrower and 4mm shorter than WG-8.

GR IV is 20 g heavier than WG-8.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV · 33mm WG-8

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR IV back view

GR IV

109 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-8

118 × 66 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR IV top view

GR IV

109 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-8

118 × 33 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IVWG-8
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
1.5Limited
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
1.0Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    49 vs 9 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only GR IV supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Eye

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

WG-8

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 118.2, 65.5, 33.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Pet

  • Weather sealing

    Only WG-8 supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    340 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    242 g vs 262 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

WG-8

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • 4K video
  • GPS and compass
  • Macro stand included

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Limited manual control
  • No RAW focus

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR IV and WG-8 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV
WG-8
Resolution
25.74 MP+29%
20 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
No
GR IV
WG-8
Aperture
F2.8-F16
F3.5-F5.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
28-140 mm
GR IV
WG-8
Processor
GR ENGINE 7
Image processor
GR IV
WG-8
ISO min (native)
100−25 less
125
ISO max (native)
204,800+5 stops
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
6,400
GR IV
WG-8
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR IV or WG-8?

GR IV scores 6.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-8 — 25.74MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV and WG-8?

GR IV is 25.74 MP and WG-8 is 20 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV and WG-8 have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV has in-body image stabilization, while WG-8 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV and WG-8?

GR IV weighs 262 g and WG-8 weighs 242 g, so the WG-8 is 20 g lighter.

Do the GR IV and WG-8 record 4K video?

GR IV: 4K up to 60p. WG-8: 4K up to 30p.

Are the GR IV and WG-8 weather sealed?

GR IV: No. WG-8: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV and 340 shots for the WG-8, giving the WG-8 the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV launched at $1,499 and WG-8 at $399. The WG-8 is $1,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR IV vs WG-8 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh press materials.