Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 V

Canon

EOS R6 V

Video-first 32.5MP full-frame EOS V-series body with 7K RAW 60p, 4K 120p, active cooling, and Canon RF mount.

$2,499

Released May 2026

vs

Sony

Alpha 6400

Popular APS-C body with fast AF and 11fps burst for enthusiasts.

$899

Released Feb 2019

EOS R6 V is 7.3 years newer.

Wins

13categories

EOS R6 V

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

1categories

Alpha 6400

Travel

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 V wins 5 categories·Alpha 6400 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 V has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher AF points / zones (6097 vs 425)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AEOS R6 V has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 VAlpha 6400
Resolution32.5 MP24.2 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max64,00032,000
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K120 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight688 g403 g
Battery640 shots410 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 V front view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 × 80 mm

688 g (1.52 lb / 24.27 oz)

Alpha 6400

120 × 67 × 60 mm

403 g (0.89 lb / 14.22 oz)

EOS R6 V is 22mm wider, 16mm taller, and 20mm thicker than Alpha 6400.

EOS R6 V is 285 g heavier than Alpha 6400.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R6 V · 60mm Alpha 6400

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 V back view

EOS R6 V

142 × 83 mm

Alpha 6400

120 × 67 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 V top view

EOS R6 V

142 × 80 mm

Alpha 6400

120 × 60 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 V

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 6400

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 V

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 6400

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 VAlpha 6400
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 V

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 141.8, 83.3, 79.7

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    6097 vs 425 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6400

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 120, 66.9, 59.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • Weight

    403 g vs 688 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 V

Pros

  • 7K RAW 60p and 7K Open Gate recording
  • 4K DCI/UHD 120p with no crop
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with people, animal, and vehicle detection
  • Active cooling for long-form recording
  • Full-size HDMI and dual CFexpress/SD card recording

Cons

  • No built-in EVF
  • Single CFexpress Type B slot plus one SD slot
  • Video-first body may be less ideal for stills-first shooters
  • Battery grip not supported

Alpha 6400

Pros

  • Fast AF
  • Compact
  • Great value

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Older design
  • No headphone jack

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 V
Alpha 6400
Resolution
32.5 MP+34%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C Exmor CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 V
Alpha 6400
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
609714.3× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-2 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Horse, Vehicle, Airplane, Train
Human, Animal
EOS R6 V
Alpha 6400
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+9%
11 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps3.6× more
11 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames2.5× more
60 frames
EOS R6 V
Alpha 6400
Max resolution
7K RAW / 7K Open Gate
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
120 fps4× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3
S-Log2 / S-Log3 / HLG
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
XAVC S, AVCHD, H.264
EOS R6 V
Alpha 6400
Weight
688 g
403 g−285 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
141.8 × 83.3 × 79.7 mm
120 × 66.9 × 59.7 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 V or Alpha 6400?

EOS R6 V scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for Alpha 6400 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 V and Alpha 6400?

EOS R6 V is 32.5 MP and Alpha 6400 is 24.2 MP, so the EOS R6 V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 V and Alpha 6400 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 V has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while alpha 6400 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 V or the Alpha 6400?

EOS R6 V reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 6400 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 V and Alpha 6400?

EOS R6 V weighs 688 g and Alpha 6400 weighs 403 g, so the Alpha 6400 is 285 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 V and Alpha 6400 record 4K video?

EOS R6 V: 4K up to 120p. Alpha 6400: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 V and Alpha 6400 weather sealed?

EOS R6 V: Yes. Alpha 6400: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 V and 410 shots for the Alpha 6400, giving the EOS R6 V the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 V launched at $2,499 and Alpha 6400 at $899. The Alpha 6400 is $1,600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.