Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Alpha 6400

Sony

Alpha 6400

Popular APS-C body with fast AF and 11fps burst for enthusiasts.

$899

Launch price

Released Feb 2019

vs

Sony

Alpha 9 III

Global shutter sports flagship with 120fps and zero rolling shutter for pro action.

$5,999

Launch price

Released Jan 2024

Alpha 9 III is 4.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

Alpha 6400

Travel

Wins

12categories

Alpha 9 III

Sports & ActionWildlife

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Alpha 6400 wins 1 categories·Alpha 9 III wins 4 categories
  • AAlpha 6400 has higher Burst (mechanical) (11 fps vs 0 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 9 III has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 46 frames)

Key specs at a glance

Alpha 6400Alpha 9 III
Resolution24.2 MP24.6 MP
SensorAPS-CFull Frame
ISO max32,00025,600
Burst11 fps120 fps
4K29.97 fps120 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight403 g703 g
Battery360 shots400 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Alpha 6400 front view

Alpha 6400

120 × 67 × 60 mm

403 g (0.89 lb / 14.22 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 × 83 mm

703 g (1.55 lb / 24.80 oz)

Alpha 6400 is 16mm narrower, 30mm shorter, and 23mm thinner than Alpha 9 III.

Alpha 6400 is 300 g lighter than Alpha 9 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 60mm Alpha 6400 · 83mm Alpha 9 III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Alpha 6400 back view

Alpha 6400

120 × 67 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Alpha 6400 top view

Alpha 6400

120 × 60 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 9 III

136 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 6400

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Alpha 9 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Alpha 6400

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Alpha 9 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseAlpha 6400Alpha 9 III
Portrait
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.5Fair
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
3.0Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good
7.0Good
Wildlife
5.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Alpha 6400

  • Burst (mechanical)

    11 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 120, 66.9, 59.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC…

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 250 — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds AVCHD

  • Weight

    403 g vs 703 g — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    32,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.07 × vs 0.9 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 9 III

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S-I, H.265…

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 46 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 94 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Alpha 6400

Pros

  • Fast AF
  • Compact
  • Great value

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Older design
  • No headphone jack

Alpha 9 III

Pros

  • Global shutter 120fps
  • Zero rolling shutter
  • Pro sports AF
  • Pre-capture buffer

Cons

  • 24.6MP only
  • Premium price
  • Battery drain at max speed

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Alpha 6400 and Alpha 9 III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Alpha 6400
Alpha 9 III
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.6 MP+2%
Sensor type
CMOS
Full Frame Global Shutter Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
Alpha 6400
Alpha 9 III
Processor
BIONZ X
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
Alpha 6400
Alpha 9 III
ISO min (native)
100−150 less
250
ISO max (native)
32,000+0.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
51,200
Alpha 6400
Alpha 9 III
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Global electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/80000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, Alpha 6400 or Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 9 III scores 8.0/10 versus 2.0/10 for Alpha 6400 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the Alpha 6400 and Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 6400 is 24.2 MP and Alpha 9 III is 24.6 MP, so the Alpha 9 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Alpha 6400 and Alpha 9 III have in-body image stabilization?

Alpha 6400 does not have IBIS, while Alpha 9 III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Alpha 6400 or the Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 6400 reaches 11 fps electronic. Alpha 9 III reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Alpha 6400 and Alpha 9 III?

Alpha 6400 weighs 403 g and Alpha 9 III weighs 703 g, so the Alpha 6400 is 300 g lighter.

Do the Alpha 6400 and Alpha 9 III record 4K video?

Alpha 6400: 4K up to 29.97p. Alpha 9 III: 4K up to 120p.

Are the Alpha 6400 and Alpha 9 III weather sealed?

Alpha 6400: Yes. Alpha 9 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 360 shots (CIPA) for the Alpha 6400 and 400 shots for the Alpha 9 III, giving the Alpha 9 III the edge.

How much does each cost?

Alpha 6400 launched at $899 and Alpha 9 III at $5,999. The Alpha 6400 is $5,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Alpha 6400 vs Alpha 9 III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Sony press materials.