Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R7

Canon

EOS R7

32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

vs

Pentax

K-3 Mark III

APS-C DSLR flagship with optical viewfinder and weather sealing.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Apr 2021

EOS R7 is 1.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R7

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

4categories

K-3 Mark III

WildlifeTravel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R7 wins 3 categories·K-3 Mark III wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R7 has higher AF points / zones (651 vs 101)
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher RAW buffer depth (120 frames vs 42 frames)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 8 fps)
  • BK-3 Mark III has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R7K-3 Mark III
Resolution32.5 MP25.7 MP
Sensor22.3 x 14.8APS-C
ISO max32,00025,600
Burst30 fps20 fps
4K59.94 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop7-stop
Weight612 g520 g
Battery660 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R7 front view

EOS R7

132 × 90 × 92 mm

612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-3 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)

EOS R7 is 6mm narrower and 8mm shorter than K-3 Mark III but it is also 4mm thicker.

EOS R7 is 92 g heavier than K-3 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 88mm K-3 Mark III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R7 back view

EOS R7

132 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

K-3 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R7 top view

EOS R7

132 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

K-3 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R7

22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C

330 mm² area

K-3 Mark III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

1.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R7

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

K-3 Mark III

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R7K-3 Mark III
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
6.0Good✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
8.5Excellent
8.5Excellent
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
6.0Good
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R7

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AF points / zones

    651 vs 101 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds AAC, LPCM

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R7 supports it

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 8 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-3 Mark III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    120 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Weight

    520 g vs 612 g — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R7

Pros

  • High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
  • Up to 30fps electronic burst
  • 7-stop in-body stabilization
  • Dual SD UHS-II card slots
  • Strong value for wildlife and sports reach

Cons

  • APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
  • RF-S lens lineup is still limited
  • 4K 60p uses a crop in some modes

K-3 Mark III

Pros

  • Optical viewfinder
  • Weather sealed
  • IBIS in DSLR

Cons

  • DSLR system declining
  • APS-C
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and K-3 Mark III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R7
K-3 Mark III
Resolution
32.5 MP+26%
25.7 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 x 14.8
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R7
K-3 Mark III
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R7
K-3 Mark III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
32,000+0.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
EOS R7
K-3 Mark III
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R7 or K-3 Mark III?

K-3 Mark III scores 6.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R7 — 4K recording.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and K-3 Mark III?

EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and K-3 Mark III is 25.7 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R7 and K-3 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-3 Mark III has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the K-3 Mark III?

EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. K-3 Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and K-3 Mark III?

EOS R7 weighs 612 g and K-3 Mark III weighs 520 g, so the K-3 Mark III is 92 g lighter.

Do the EOS R7 and K-3 Mark III record 4K video?

EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p. K-3 Mark III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R7 and K-3 Mark III weather sealed?

EOS R7: Yes. K-3 Mark III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 640 shots for the K-3 Mark III, giving the EOS R7 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and K-3 Mark III at $1,999. The EOS R7 is $500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs K-3 Mark III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Pentax press materials.