Canon
EOS R8 Mark II
Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2026
Fujifilm
instax WIDE Evo
Hybrid Instax Wide camera with 1/3-inch CMOS, 16mm ultra-wide lens, wide-angle mode up to 16MP, 3.5-inch LCD, and Bluetooth app printing.
$350
Launch priceReleased Feb 2025
EOS R8 Mark II is 1.6 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R8 Mark II
Wins
instax WIDE Evo
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 1,600)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (340 shots vs 100 shots)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (250 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 16 MP)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 × 80 mm
499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
instax WIDE Evo
139 × 125 × 63 mm
490 g (1.08 lb / 17.28 oz)
EOS R8 Mark II is 7mm narrower and 35mm shorter than instax WIDE Evo but it is also 17mm thicker.
EOS R8 Mark II is 9 g heavier than instax WIDE Evo.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 63mm instax WIDE Evo
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
instax WIDE Evo
139 × 125 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 80 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
instax WIDE Evo
139 × 63 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R8 Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R8 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
instax WIDE Evo: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R8 Mark II
Codecs
Adds XF-HEVC S
IBIS effectiveness
7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Stabilization modes
Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
ISO max (native)
25,600 vs 1,600 — higher is better
Battery life (CIPA)
340 shots vs 100 shots — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R8 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
instax WIDE Evo
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.7, 125, 62.8
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC
Weight
490 g vs 499 g — lower is better
4K max frame rate
60 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R8 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
- ✓Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
- ✓40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
- ✓Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
- ✓Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack
Cons
- –Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
- –Single SD UHS-II slot
- –LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
- –No mechanical shutter
instax WIDE Evo
Pros
- ✓Digital capture + Instax Wide prints
- ✓Widest instax lens (16mm equiv.)
- ✓Wide-angle mode (4608×3456)
- ✓10 lens × 10 film effect combos
- ✓Internal memory + microSD
Cons
- –Small 1/3-inch sensor
- –No video recording
- –Heavy for instant camera (490g)
- –Film cost per print
- –Fixed lens only
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
Fujifilm instax WIDE Evo
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, EOS R8 Mark II or instax WIDE Evo?
EOS R8 Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 2.0/10 for instax WIDE Evo — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo?
EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and instax WIDE Evo is 16 MP, so the EOS R8 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while instax WIDE Evo does not have IBIS.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo?
EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and instax WIDE Evo weighs 490 g, so the instax WIDE Evo is 9 g lighter.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo record 4K video?
EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. instax WIDE Evo: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R8 Mark II and instax WIDE Evo weather sealed?
EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. instax WIDE Evo: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 100 shots for the instax WIDE Evo, giving the EOS R8 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and instax WIDE Evo at $350. The instax WIDE Evo is $1,549 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs instax WIDE Evo vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.