Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8 Mark II

Canon

EOS R8 Mark II

Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

vs

Panasonic

LUMIX FZ80D

60x superzoom bridge with 18.1MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 20–1200mm f/2.8–5.9 Leica lens, 4K video, 2.36M-dot EVF, USB-C, and POWER O.I.S.

$478

Launch price

Released Dec 2024

EOS R8 Mark II is 1.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

13categories

EOS R8 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

3categories

LUMIX FZ80D

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 Mark II wins 5 categories·LUMIX FZ80D wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (73 frames vs 10 frames)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8 Mark IILUMIX FZ80D
Resolution24.2 MP18.1 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 x 4.55 mm
ISO max25,6003,200
Burst40 fps10 fps
4K59.94 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight499 g640 g
Battery340 shots330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II front view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 × 80 mm

499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

LUMIX FZ80D

130 × 94 × 125 mm

640 g (1.41 lb / 22.58 oz)

EOS R8 Mark II is 4mm shorter and 45mm thinner than LUMIX FZ80D but it is also 1mm wider.

EOS R8 Mark II is 141 g lighter than LUMIX FZ80D.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 125mm LUMIX FZ80D

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 Mark II back view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

LUMIX FZ80D

130 × 94 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 Mark II top view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

LUMIX FZ80D

130 × 125 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

LUMIX FZ80D

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

LUMIX FZ80D: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8 Mark IILUMIX FZ80D
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
6.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XF-HEVC S

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 3,200 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

LUMIX FZ80D

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, MP4, AVCHD

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130.2, 94.3, 125.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I U3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.74 × vs 0.7 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • EVF resolutionBoth 2,360,000
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8 Mark II

Pros

  • Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
  • Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
  • 40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
  • Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
  • Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack

Cons

  • Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
  • Single SD UHS-II slot
  • LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
  • No mechanical shutter

LUMIX FZ80D

Pros

  • 60x 20–1200mm equivalent reach
  • Wide f/2.8 at wide end
  • 2.36M-dot OLED EVF + 1.84M-dot touchscreen
  • 4K video + 4K Photo
  • USB-C charging

Cons

  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Bulky bridge body (~640 g)
  • No mic/headphone jacks
  • Contrast-detect AF only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8 Mark II
LUMIX FZ80D
Resolution
24.2 MP+34%
18.1 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
1/2.3-inch BSI MOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
6.17 x 4.55 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R8 Mark II
LUMIX FZ80D
Aperture
f/2.8-5.9
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
20-1200 mm
EOS R8 Mark II
LUMIX FZ80D
Processor
DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R8 Mark II
LUMIX FZ80D
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
25,600+3 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
6,400
EOS R8 Mark II
LUMIX FZ80D
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R8 Mark II or LUMIX FZ80D?

EOS R8 Mark II scores 10.0/10 versus 3.0/10 for LUMIX FZ80D — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D?

EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and LUMIX FZ80D is 18.1 MP, so the EOS R8 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while LUMIX FZ80D does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the LUMIX FZ80D?

EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. LUMIX FZ80D reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D?

EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and LUMIX FZ80D weighs 640 g, so the EOS R8 Mark II is 141 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D record 4K video?

EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. LUMIX FZ80D: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R8 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D weather sealed?

EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. LUMIX FZ80D: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 330 shots for the LUMIX FZ80D, giving the EOS R8 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and LUMIX FZ80D at $478. The LUMIX FZ80D is $1,421 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs LUMIX FZ80D vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.