Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Panasonic
LUMIX FZ80D
60x superzoom bridge with 18.1MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 20–1200mm f/2.8–5.9 Leica lens, 4K video, 2.36M-dot EVF, USB-C, and POWER O.I.S.
$478
Launch priceReleased Dec 2024
LUMIX FZ80D is 2.1 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
LUMIX FZ80D
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 10 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 10 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
LUMIX FZ80D
130 × 94 × 125 mm
640 g (1.41 lb / 22.58 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 37mm thinner than LUMIX FZ80D but it is also 8mm wider and 4mm taller.
EOS R6 Mark II is 30 g heavier than LUMIX FZ80D.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 125mm LUMIX FZ80D
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
LUMIX FZ80D
130 × 94 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
LUMIX FZ80D
130 × 125 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
LUMIX FZ80D
6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact
28 mm² area
30.6× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
LUMIX FZ80D: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 49 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better
Reasons to choose
LUMIX FZ80D
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Face, Eye…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 130.2, 94.3, 125.2
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I U3
Codecs
Adds MP4, AVCHD
ISO min (native)
80 vs 100 — lower is better
Weight
640 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
LUMIX FZ80D
Pros
- ✓60x 20–1200mm equivalent reach
- ✓Wide f/2.8 at wide end
- ✓2.36M-dot OLED EVF + 1.84M-dot touchscreen
- ✓4K video + 4K Photo
- ✓USB-C charging
Cons
- –Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
- –Bulky bridge body (~640 g)
- –No mic/headphone jacks
- –Contrast-detect AF only
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Panasonic LUMIX FZ80D
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or LUMIX FZ80D?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for LUMIX FZ80D — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and LUMIX FZ80D is 18.1 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while LUMIX FZ80D does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the LUMIX FZ80D?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. LUMIX FZ80D reaches 10 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and LUMIX FZ80D weighs 640 g, so the LUMIX FZ80D is 30 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. LUMIX FZ80D: 4K up to 30p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and LUMIX FZ80D weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. LUMIX FZ80D: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 330 shots for the LUMIX FZ80D, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and LUMIX FZ80D at $478. The LUMIX FZ80D is $2,021 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs LUMIX FZ80D vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.