Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R8 Mark II

Canon

EOS R8 Mark II

Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.

$1,899

Launch price

Released Sep 2026

vs

Panasonic

Lumix ZS99

Pocket travel zoom with 20.3MP 1/2.3-inch sensor, 30x 24–720mm Leica lens, 4K30 video, 5-axis O.I.S., tilting touchscreen, and USB-C — successor to ZS80 without EVF.

$500

Launch price

Released Feb 2025

EOS R8 Mark II is 1.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

EOS R8 Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

4categories

Lumix ZS99

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R8 Mark II wins 5 categories·Lumix ZS99 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (7.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (73 frames vs 10 frames)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 6,400)
  • AEOS R8 Mark II has higher 1080p max frame rate (180 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R8 Mark IILumix ZS99
Resolution24.2 MP20.3 MP
SensorFull Frame6.17 x 4.55 mm
ISO max25,6006,400
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K59.94 fps30 fps
IBIS7.5-stopNo
Weight499 g322 g
Battery340 shots380 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II front view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 × 80 mm

499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix ZS99

112 × 68 × 43 mm

322 g (0.71 lb / 11.36 oz)

EOS R8 Mark II is 19mm wider, 22mm taller, and 37mm thicker than Lumix ZS99.

EOS R8 Mark II is 177 g heavier than Lumix ZS99.

Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 43mm Lumix ZS99

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R8 Mark II back view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 90 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix ZS99

112 × 68 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R8 Mark II top view

EOS R8 Mark II

131 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Lumix ZS99

112 × 43 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R8 Mark II

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lumix ZS99

6.17 × 4.55 mm · Compact

28 mm² area

30.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R8 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix ZS99: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R8 Mark IILumix ZS99
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
6.0Good✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R8 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -7.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XF-HEVC S

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    73 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS99

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, MP4

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112, 67.8, 43.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Weight

    322 g vs 499 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    80 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    380 shots vs 340 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R8 Mark II

Pros

  • Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
  • Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
  • 40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
  • Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
  • Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack

Cons

  • Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
  • Single SD UHS-II slot
  • LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
  • No mechanical shutter

Lumix ZS99

Pros

  • 30x 24–720mm Leica zoom in pocket body
  • 4K video + 4K Photo at 30fps
  • 5-axis HYBRID O.I.S.+
  • 1.84M-dot tilting touchscreen
  • USB-C charging + Wi-Fi/Bluetooth 5.0

Cons

  • No built-in EVF (vs ZS80)
  • Small 1/2.3-inch sensor
  • Slow variable aperture (f/3.3–6.4)
  • Limited low-light performance

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix ZS99 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R8 Mark II
Lumix ZS99
Resolution
24.2 MP+19%
20.3 MP
Sensor type
CMOS
1/2.3-inch BSI MOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
6.17 x 4.55 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R8 Mark II
Lumix ZS99
Aperture
f/3.3-6.4
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24-720 mm
EOS R8 Mark II
Lumix ZS99
Processor
DIGIC X
Venus Engine
EOS R8 Mark II
Lumix ZS99
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
25,600+2 stops
6,400
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
6,400
EOS R8 Mark II
Lumix ZS99
Shutter type
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R8 Mark II or Lumix ZS99?

EOS R8 Mark II scores 6.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix ZS99 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix ZS99?

EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix ZS99 is 20.3 MP, so the EOS R8 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix ZS99 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix ZS99 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the Lumix ZS99?

EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix ZS99 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix ZS99?

EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and Lumix ZS99 weighs 322 g, so the Lumix ZS99 is 177 g lighter.

Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix ZS99 record 4K video?

EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. Lumix ZS99: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R8 Mark II and Lumix ZS99 weather sealed?

EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. Lumix ZS99: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 340 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R8 Mark II and 380 shots for the Lumix ZS99, giving the Lumix ZS99 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and Lumix ZS99 at $500. The Lumix ZS99 is $1,399 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs Lumix ZS99 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.