Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Canon

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

1-inch premium compact with pop-up EVF, 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, and 4K for travel.

$899

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's AI processing unit.

$4,499

Launch price

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 6.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

10categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

PowerShot G5 X Mark II wins 0 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 5 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 120 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher EVF resolution (9,437,184 vs 2,360,000)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 20.1 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)

Key specs at a glance

PowerShot G5 X Mark IIAlpha 7R VI
Resolution20.1 MP66.8 MP
Sensor13.2 × 8.8 mmFull Frame
ISO max12,80032,000
Burst30 fps30 fps
4K30 fps120 fps
IBIS6-stopYes
Weight340 g713 g
Battery320 shots600 shots

Size and weight, to scale

PowerShot G5 X Mark II front view

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

111 × 61 × 46 mm

340 g (0.75 lb / 11.99 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 22mm narrower, 36mm shorter, and 37mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI.

PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 373 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm PowerShot G5 X Mark II · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

PowerShot G5 X Mark II back view

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

111 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

PowerShot G5 X Mark II top view

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

111 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

7.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

PowerShot G5 X Mark II: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casePowerShot G5 X Mark IIAlpha 7R VI
Portrait
4.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 110.9, 60.9, 46

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    340 g vs 713 g — lower is better

  • AA filter

    Only PowerShot G5 X Mark II supports it

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -6 EV — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only PowerShot G5 X Mark II supports it

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 759 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 120 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    9,437,184 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    32,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 30 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

PowerShot G5 X Mark II

Pros

  • Pop-up EVF
  • 24–120mm f/1.8–2.8
  • 4K video
  • Compact premium

Cons

  • 1-inch sensor
  • Fixed lens
  • Superseded by G7 X IV

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP stacked full-frame sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the PowerShot G5 X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
20.1 MP
66.8 MP3.3× more
Sensor type
1"-Type CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
13.2 × 8.8 mm
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Aperture
1.8-2.8
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24-120mm
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ XR with AI processing unit
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
ISO min (native)
125
100−25 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
32,000+1.3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
PowerShot G5 X Mark II
Alpha 7R VI
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical focal plane shutter + electronic rolling shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, PowerShot G5 X Mark II or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 7.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for PowerShot G5 X Mark II — 66.8MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the PowerShot G5 X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?

PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 20.1 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the PowerShot G5 X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

PowerShot G5 X Mark II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the PowerShot G5 X Mark II or the Alpha 7R VI?

PowerShot G5 X Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. Alpha 7R VI reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the PowerShot G5 X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI?

PowerShot G5 X Mark II weighs 340 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the PowerShot G5 X Mark II is 373 g lighter.

Do the PowerShot G5 X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

PowerShot G5 X Mark II: 4K up to 30p. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the PowerShot G5 X Mark II and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

PowerShot G5 X Mark II: No. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the PowerShot G5 X Mark II and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

PowerShot G5 X Mark II launched at $899 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The PowerShot G5 X Mark II is $3,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way PowerShot G5 X Mark II vs Alpha 7R VI vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.