Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

PowerShot V1

Compact creator camera with a 22.3MP 1.4-type sensor, built-in 16–50mm f/2.8–4.5 zoom, cooling fan, and Canon Log 3.

$899

Released Apr 2025

vs

DJI

Osmo Nano

Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.

$299

Released Sep 2025

Osmo Nano is 5 months newer.

Wins

5categories

PowerShot V1

Vlogging

Wins

5categories

Osmo Nano

Travel

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

PowerShot V1 wins 3 categories·Osmo Nano wins 2 categories
  • APowerShot V1 has higher AF points / zones (3431 vs 0)
  • BOsmo Nano has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (52 g vs 426 g)
  • APowerShot V1 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 6 fps)
  • APowerShot V1 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)

Key specs at a glance

PowerShot V1Osmo Nano
Resolution22.3 MP35 MP
Sensor18.4 × 12.3 mm1/1.3 inch
ISO max32,00025,600
Burst30 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight426 g52 g
Battery400 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

PowerShot V1

118 × 68 × 53 mm

426 g (0.94 lb / 15.03 oz)

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 × 28 mm

52 g (0.11 lb / 1.83 oz)

PowerShot V1 is 61mm wider, 39mm taller, and 25mm thicker than Osmo Nano.

PowerShot V1 is 374 g heavier than Osmo Nano.

Depth (front-to-back): 53mm PowerShot V1 · 28mm Osmo Nano

Sensor size, to scale

PowerShot V1

18.4 × 12.3 mm · 1.4-type

226 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casePowerShot V1Osmo Nano
Portrait
3.0Limited✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
5.0Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
0.0Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
4.0Fair
4.5Fair✓ wins
Vlogging
6.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

PowerShot V1

  • AF points / zones

    3431 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 118.3, 68, 52.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only PowerShot V1 supports it

  • Eye AF

    Only PowerShot V1 supports it

Reasons to choose

Osmo Nano

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 57.3, 29.5, 28

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    52 g vs 426 g — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only Osmo Nano supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only Osmo Nano supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 400 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

PowerShot V1

Pros

  • Large 1.4-type sensor for a compact
  • Built-in 16–50mm f/2.8–4.5 zoom
  • 4K 60p and Canon Log 3
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
  • Cooling fan for longer recording

Cons

  • Fixed lens limits flexibility
  • 4K 60p uses cropped mode
  • No built-in EVF

Osmo Nano

Pros

  • 52g camera body
  • 1/1.3-inch sensor
  • 4K 120fps slow motion
  • 10m waterproof camera body

Cons

  • Dock is only IPX4
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens
  • Smaller battery in camera body

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the PowerShot V1 and Osmo Nano at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

PowerShot V1
Osmo Nano
Resolution
22.3 MP
35 MP+57%
Sensor type
1.4-type CMOS
1/1.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
18.4 × 12.3 mm
1/1.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
PowerShot V1
Osmo Nano
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fixed focus
AF points / zones
3431
0
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Animal
PowerShot V1
Osmo Nano
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps2.5× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps2× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
Yes
RAW buffer depth
45 frames
60 frames+33%
PowerShot V1
Osmo Nano
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps+70%
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
HEVC
PowerShot V1
Osmo Nano
Weight
426 g
52 g−374 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
118.3 × 68 × 52.5 mm
57.3 × 29.5 × 28 mm
Weather sealing
No
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, PowerShot V1 or Osmo Nano?

Osmo Nano scores 8.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for PowerShot V1 — 52g — ultralight for all-day carry.

What's the resolution difference between the PowerShot V1 and Osmo Nano?

PowerShot V1 is 22.3 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the PowerShot V1 and Osmo Nano have in-body image stabilization?

PowerShot V1 does not have IBIS, while osmo Nano does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the PowerShot V1 or the Osmo Nano?

PowerShot V1 reaches 30 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the PowerShot V1 and Osmo Nano?

PowerShot V1 weighs 426 g and Osmo Nano weighs 52 g, so the Osmo Nano is 374 g lighter.

Do the PowerShot V1 and Osmo Nano record 4K video?

PowerShot V1: 4K up to 60p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.

Are the PowerShot V1 and Osmo Nano weather sealed?

PowerShot V1: No. Osmo Nano: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 400 shots (CIPA) for the PowerShot V1 and 640 shots for the Osmo Nano, giving the Osmo Nano the edge.

How much does each cost?

PowerShot V1 launched at $899 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $600 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.