Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

DJI

Osmo Nano

Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.

$299

Released Sep 2025

vs
Alpha 1 II

Sony

Alpha 1 II

50MP stacked flagship with 30fps RAW, 8K video, and Sony's fastest hybrid performance.

$6,499

Released Nov 2024

Osmo Nano is 9 months newer.

Wins

3categories

Osmo Nano

Travel

Wins

9categories

Alpha 1 II

Video & HybridWildlife

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Nano wins 1 categories·Alpha 1 II wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 0)
  • AOsmo Nano has lower Weight (52 g vs 743 g)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 60 frames)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)
  • BAlpha 1 II has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo NanoAlpha 1 II
Resolution35 MP50.1 MP
Sensor1/1.3 inchFull Frame
ISO max25,60032,000
Burst15 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight52 g743 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 × 28 mm

52 g (0.11 lb / 1.83 oz)

Alpha 1 II front view

Alpha 1 II

136 × 97 × 83 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Osmo Nano is 79mm narrower, 67mm shorter, and 55mm thinner than Alpha 1 II.

Osmo Nano is 691 g lighter than Alpha 1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 28mm Osmo Nano · 83mm Alpha 1 II

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 1 II

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable

Alpha 1 II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo NanoAlpha 1 II
Portrait
2.5Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good
Wildlife
4.5Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Nano

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 57.3, 29.5, 28

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    52 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 1 II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.1, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SD UHS-II

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 1 II supports it

  • Eye AF

    Only Alpha 1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Nano

Pros

  • 52g camera body
  • 1/1.3-inch sensor
  • 4K 120fps slow motion
  • 10m waterproof camera body

Cons

  • Dock is only IPX4
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens
  • Smaller battery in camera body

Alpha 1 II

Pros

  • 50MP stacked sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free burst
  • 8K 30p video
  • Best Sony AF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Complex menus
  • Large files

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Nano
Alpha 1 II
Resolution
35 MP
50.1 MP+43%
Sensor type
1/1.3-inch CMOS
Full Frame Stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
1/1.3 inch
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Osmo Nano
Alpha 1 II
AF system
Fixed focus
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
0
759
AF frame coverage
94 %
AF low-light limit
-4 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Insect, Car/Train, Airplane
Osmo Nano
Alpha 1 II
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
10 fps+67%
Burst (electronic)
15 fps
30 fps2× more
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
200 frames3.3× more
Osmo Nano
Alpha 1 II
Max resolution
4K
8K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps+33%
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Standard profiles
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
HEVC
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
Osmo Nano
Alpha 1 II
Weight
52 g−691 g less
743 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
57.3 × 29.5 × 28 mm
136.1 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, Osmo Nano or Alpha 1 II?

Alpha 1 II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo Nano — 50.1MP — excellent for large prints and crops.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Nano and Alpha 1 II?

Osmo Nano is 35 MP and Alpha 1 II is 50.1 MP, so the Alpha 1 II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Osmo Nano and Alpha 1 II have in-body image stabilization?

Osmo Nano does not have IBIS, while alpha 1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo Nano or the Alpha 1 II?

Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic. Alpha 1 II reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Nano and Alpha 1 II?

Osmo Nano weighs 52 g and Alpha 1 II weighs 743 g, so the Osmo Nano is 691 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Nano and Alpha 1 II record 4K video?

Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 1 II: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the Osmo Nano and Alpha 1 II weather sealed?

Osmo Nano: Yes. Alpha 1 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo Nano and 520 shots for the Alpha 1 II, giving the Osmo Nano the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo Nano launched at $299 and Alpha 1 II at $6,499. The Osmo Nano is $6,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and Sony press materials.