Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Released Jul 2024

vs

DJI

Osmo Nano

Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.

$299

Released Sep 2025

Osmo Nano is 1.2 years newer.

Wins

7categories

EOS R1

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

2categories

Osmo Nano

Travel

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 4 categories·Osmo Nano wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (52 g vs 1115 g)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1Osmo Nano
Resolution24.2 MP35 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.3 inch
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight1115 g52 g
Battery640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

1115 g (2.46 lb / 39.33 oz)

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 × 28 mm

52 g (0.11 lb / 1.83 oz)

EOS R1 is 100mm wider, 120mm taller, and 59mm thicker than Osmo Nano.

EOS R1 is 1063 g heavier than Osmo Nano.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 28mm Osmo Nano

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

Osmo Nano

57 × 28 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1Osmo Nano
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R1 supports it

Reasons to choose

Osmo Nano

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 57.3, 29.5, 28

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    52 g vs 1115 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    35 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

Osmo Nano

Pros

  • 52g camera body
  • 1/1.3-inch sensor
  • 4K 120fps slow motion
  • 10m waterproof camera body

Cons

  • Dock is only IPX4
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens
  • Smaller battery in camera body

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
Osmo Nano
Resolution
24.2 MP
35 MP+45%
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
1/1.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
1/1.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R1
Osmo Nano
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF with cross-type AF
Fixed focus
AF points / zones
1053
0
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R1
Osmo Nano
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.7× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
EOS R1
Osmo Nano
Max resolution
6K RAW
4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
HEVC
EOS R1
Osmo Nano
Weight
1115 g
52 g−1,063 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
157.6 × 149.5 × 87.3 mm
57.3 × 29.5 × 28 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R1 or Osmo Nano?

EOS R1 scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo Nano — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and Osmo Nano?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and Osmo Nano have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while osmo Nano does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R1 or the Osmo Nano?

EOS R1 reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and Osmo Nano?

EOS R1 weighs 1115 g and Osmo Nano weighs 52 g, so the Osmo Nano is 1063 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and Osmo Nano record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R1 and Osmo Nano weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. Osmo Nano: Yes.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $6,000 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.