Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
DJI
Osmo Nano
Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.
$299
Launch priceReleased Sep 2025
Osmo Nano is 2.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
Osmo Nano
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
- BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (124 g vs 670 g)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 × 28 mm
124 g (0.27 lb / 4.37 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 79mm wider, 27mm taller, and 60mm thicker than Osmo Nano.
EOS R6 Mark II is 546 g heavier than Osmo Nano.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 28mm Osmo Nano
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 28 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF points / zones
1053 vs 0 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds H.265, H.264
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Osmo Nano
Codecs
Adds HEVC
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonBalancing
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 59.1, 71.7, 28
Card types
Adds microSD
Weight
124 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Resolution
35 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
Osmo Nano
Pros
- ✓52g camera body
- ✓1/1.3-inch sensor
- ✓4K 120fps slow motion
- ✓10m waterproof camera body
Cons
- –Dock is only IPX4
- –Fixed ultra-wide lens
- –Smaller battery in camera body
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Nano at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
DJI Osmo Nano
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo Nano — 24.2MP — solid resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Nano have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Osmo Nano weighs 124 g, so the Osmo Nano is 546 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Nano record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Osmo Nano weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Osmo Nano: Yes.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $2,200 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Osmo Nano vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.