Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

XF605

1-inch broadcast camcorder with DIGIC DV7, Dual Pixel CMOS AF, 4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC, 12G-SDI, ND filter, and RTMP/SRT streaming.

$4,500

Launch price

Released Aug 2021

vs

GoPro

MISSION 1

Compact cinema camera with the same 50MP 1-inch sensor and GP3 processor as MISSION 1 PRO, capped at 8K30 / 4K120 with Open Gate 4:3 and GP-Log2 10-bit.

$600

Launch price

Released May 2026

MISSION 1 is 4.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

XF605

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

2categories

MISSION 1

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

XF605 wins 4 categories·MISSION 1 wins 1 categories
  • AXF605 has lower AF low-light limit (-6.5 EV vs 0 EV)
  • AXF605 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • AXF605 has higher AF frame coverage (100 % vs 0 %)
  • BMISSION 1 has higher Resolution (50 MP vs 8.29 MP)
  • AXF605 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

XF605MISSION 1
Resolution8.29 MP50 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max51,20025,600
Burst30 fps20 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop7-stop
Weight580 g580 g
Battery520 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

XF605

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

MISSION 1

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

XF605 and MISSION 1 share virtually identical body dimensions.

XF605 and MISSION 1 weigh the same.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm XF605 · 72mm MISSION 1

Sensor size, to scale

XF605

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

MISSION 1

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseXF605MISSION 1
Portrait
4.0Fair
6.0Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
9.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Landscape
3.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
9.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

XF605

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 0 % — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 120 frames — higher is better

Reasons to choose

MISSION 1

  • Resolution

    50 MP vs 8.29 MP — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

XF605

Pros

  • 4K60p 4:2:2 10-bit XF-AVC internal
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF + iTR AF X
  • 12G-SDI + HDMI + Ethernet (SRT)
  • Built-in 3-position ND + HLG/PQ
  • Dual SD + RTMP streaming

Cons

  • Large shoulder-style body
  • Premium broadcast pricing
  • Fixed 15x zoom lens
  • 8.29MP effective on 1-inch sensor

MISSION 1

Pros

  • Same 50MP 1-inch sensor as PRO
  • 8K30 + 4K120 + Open Gate 4:3
  • GP-Log2 10-bit + rugged 20m waterproof
  • Ultra-compact cinema form factor
  • Full GoPro mount ecosystem

Cons

  • No 8K60 or 4K240 high frame rates
  • No 1080p960 burst slo-mo
  • Fixed lens only
  • Still premium vs traditional action cams

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the XF605 and MISSION 1 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

XF605
MISSION 1
Resolution
8.29 MP
50 MP6× more
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
XF605
MISSION 1
Processor
DIGIC DV7
GP3
XF605
MISSION 1
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
51,200+1 stop
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
XF605
MISSION 1
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, XF605 or MISSION 1?

XF605 scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for MISSION 1 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the XF605 and MISSION 1?

XF605 is 8.29 MP and MISSION 1 is 50 MP, so the MISSION 1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the XF605 and MISSION 1 have in-body image stabilization?

XF605 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while MISSION 1 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the XF605 or the MISSION 1?

XF605 reaches 30 fps electronic. MISSION 1 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the XF605 and MISSION 1?

Both bodies weigh roughly 580 g.

Do the XF605 and MISSION 1 record 4K video?

XF605: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. MISSION 1: 4K up to 60p.

Are the XF605 and MISSION 1 weather sealed?

XF605: Yes. MISSION 1: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the XF605 and 640 shots for the MISSION 1, giving the MISSION 1 the edge.

How much does each cost?

XF605 launched at $4,500 and MISSION 1 at $600. The MISSION 1 is $3,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way XF605 vs MISSION 1 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.