Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo Nano

DJI

Osmo Nano

Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.

$299

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

vs

OM System

OM-1 II

Flagship MFT with stacked sensor, 120fps, and pro wildlife features.

$2,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2024

Osmo Nano is 1.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

Osmo Nano

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

6categories

OM-1 II

Sports & ActionTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Nano wins 2 categories·OM-1 II wins 3 categories
  • BOM-1 II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOM-1 II has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AOsmo Nano has lower Weight (124 g vs 599 g)
  • BOM-1 II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AOsmo Nano has higher Resolution (35 MP vs 20.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo NanoOM-1 II
Resolution35 MP20.4 MP
Sensor1/1.3 inchMFT
ISO max25,600102,400
Burst15 fps120 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNo8.5-stop
Weight124 g599 g
Battery520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Nano front view

Osmo Nano

59 × 72 × 28 mm

124 g (0.27 lb / 4.37 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-1 II

135 × 92 × 73 mm

599 g (1.32 lb / 21.13 oz)

Osmo Nano is 76mm narrower, 20mm shorter, and 45mm thinner than OM-1 II.

Osmo Nano is 475 g lighter than OM-1 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 28mm Osmo Nano · 73mm OM-1 II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Osmo Nano back view

Osmo Nano

59 × 72 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 92 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Osmo Nano

59 × 28 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-1 II

135 × 73 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-1 II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable

OM-1 II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo NanoOM-1 II
Portrait
2.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent
10.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
3.5Limited✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
6.0Good
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
4.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Nano

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonBalancing

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 59.1, 71.7, 28

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    124 g vs 599 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    35 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-1 II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, H.265, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134.8, 91.6, 72.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only OM-1 II supports it

Both cameras share

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • 1080p max frame rateBoth 240 fps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Nano

Pros

  • 52g camera body
  • 1/1.3-inch sensor
  • 4K 120fps slow motion
  • 10m waterproof camera body

Cons

  • Dock is only IPX4
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens
  • Smaller battery in camera body

OM-1 II

Pros

  • 120fps stills
  • Stacked MFT
  • IP53 weather sealing
  • Computational features

Cons

  • MFT sensor size
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Menu complexity

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo Nano and OM-1 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Nano
OM-1 II
Resolution
35 MP+72%
20.4 MP
Sensor type
1/1.3-inch CMOS
4/3 Stacked BSI Live MOS
Sensor size
1/1.3 inch
17.4 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
No
Osmo Nano
OM-1 II
Aperture
f/2.8
Field of view
143 °
Osmo Nano
OM-1 II
Processor
Image processor
TruePic X
Osmo Nano
OM-1 II
ISO min (native)
100
80−20 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
102,400+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
102,400
Osmo Nano
OM-1 II
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Computerised focal-plane shutter + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, Osmo Nano or OM-1 II?

OM-1 II scores 7.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for Osmo Nano — 4K 60p for smooth handheld vlogs.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Nano and OM-1 II?

Osmo Nano is 35 MP and OM-1 II is 20.4 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Osmo Nano and OM-1 II have in-body image stabilization?

Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic), while OM-1 II has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo Nano or the OM-1 II?

Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic. OM-1 II reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Nano and OM-1 II?

Osmo Nano weighs 124 g and OM-1 II weighs 599 g, so the Osmo Nano is 475 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Nano and OM-1 II record 4K video?

Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p. OM-1 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Osmo Nano and OM-1 II weather sealed?

Osmo Nano: Yes. OM-1 II: Yes.

How much does each cost?

Osmo Nano launched at $299 and OM-1 II at $2,399. The Osmo Nano is $2,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo Nano vs OM-1 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and OM System press materials.