Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo Nano

DJI

Osmo Nano

Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.

$299

Launch price

Released Sep 2025

vs

Sony

ZV-1

The original Sony vlogging compact with a 1-inch stacked sensor, 24–70mm f/1.8–2.8 ZEISS lens, Real-time Eye AF, and side-flip screen.

$749

Launch price

Released May 2020

Osmo Nano is 5.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

Osmo Nano

TravelSports & Action

Wins

3categories

ZV-1

Sports & Action

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Nano wins 3 categories·ZV-1 wins 2 categories
  • BZV-1 has higher AF points / zones (315 vs 0)
  • AOsmo Nano has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AOsmo Nano has lower Weight (52 g vs 294 g)
  • BZV-1 has higher Burst (mechanical) (24 fps vs 6 fps)
  • AOsmo Nano has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 260 shots)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo NanoZV-1
Resolution35 MP20.1 MP
Sensor1/1.3 inch13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max25,60012,800
Burst15 fps24 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight52 g294 g
Battery640 shots260 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Nano front view

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 × 28 mm

52 g (0.11 lb / 1.83 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

ZV-1

106 × 60 × 44 mm

294 g (0.65 lb / 10.37 oz)

Osmo Nano is 48mm narrower, 31mm shorter, and 16mm thinner than ZV-1.

Osmo Nano is 242 g lighter than ZV-1.

Depth (front-to-back): 28mm Osmo Nano · 44mm ZV-1

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Osmo Nano back view

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

ZV-1

106 × 60 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Osmo Nano

57 × 28 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

ZV-1

106 × 44 mm

Sensor size, to scale

ZV-1

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″

116 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo NanoZV-1
Portrait
2.5Limited
3.0Limited✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
3.5Limited✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Wildlife
4.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
4.0Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Nano

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Stabilization modes

    Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonBalancing

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 57.3, 29.5, 28

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    52 g vs 294 g — lower is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 260 shots — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 12,800 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

ZV-1

  • AF points / zones

    315 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 105.5, 60, 43.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I, Memory Stick Duo

  • Burst (mechanical)

    24 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only ZV-1 supports it

  • Eye AF

    Only ZV-1 supports it

Both cameras share

  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Nano

Pros

  • 52g camera body
  • 1/1.3-inch sensor
  • 4K 120fps slow motion
  • 10m waterproof camera body

Cons

  • Dock is only IPX4
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens
  • Smaller battery in camera body

ZV-1

Pros

  • 1-inch stacked Exmor RS sensor with DRAM
  • 24–70mm f/1.8–2.8 ZEISS zoom
  • Real-time Eye AF and Product Showcase
  • Side vari-angle LCD for vlogging
  • 4K oversampled video and HFR slow-mo

Cons

  • Fixed 24–70mm zoom (no telephoto reach)
  • No built-in ND filter (unlike ZV-1 II)
  • No EVF
  • Short battery life for long shoots

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo Nano and ZV-1 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Nano
ZV-1
Resolution
35 MP+74%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
1/1.3-inch CMOS
1.0-type Exmor RS CMOS (stacked, with DRAM)
Sensor size
1/1.3 inch
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Osmo Nano
ZV-1
Aperture
f/2.8
f/1.8–2.8
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24–70 mm
Field of view
143 °
Osmo Nano
ZV-1
Processor
Image processor
BIONZ X
Osmo Nano
ZV-1
ISO min (native)
100−25 less
125
ISO max (native)
25,600+1 stop
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
12,800
Osmo Nano
ZV-1
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, Osmo Nano or ZV-1?

Osmo Nano scores 8.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for ZV-1 — 52g — ultralight for all-day carry.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Nano and ZV-1?

Osmo Nano is 35 MP and ZV-1 is 20.1 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Osmo Nano and ZV-1?

Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic), while ZV-1 uses Optical SteadyShot + Active electronic (electronic).

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo Nano or the ZV-1?

Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic. ZV-1 reaches 24 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Nano and ZV-1?

Osmo Nano weighs 52 g and ZV-1 weighs 294 g, so the Osmo Nano is 242 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Nano and ZV-1 record 4K video?

Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p. ZV-1: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Osmo Nano and ZV-1 weather sealed?

Osmo Nano: Yes. ZV-1: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo Nano and 260 shots for the ZV-1, giving the Osmo Nano the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo Nano launched at $299 and ZV-1 at $749. The Osmo Nano is $450 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo Nano vs ZV-1 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and Sony press materials.