Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

DJI

Osmo Pocket 3

Pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch sensor, 4K 120p, and rotating 2-inch OLED screen.

$519

Released Oct 2023

vs

Fujifilm

XF10

Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.

$499

Released Jul 2018

Osmo Pocket 3 is 5.3 years newer.

Wins

8categories

Osmo Pocket 3

Wins

1categories

XF10

2 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Pocket 3 wins 4 categories·XF10 wins 1 categories
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 10 frames)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 200)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher Max video bit rate (200 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • BXF10 has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo Pocket 3XF10
Resolution9.4 MP24.2 MP
Sensor1 inchAPS-C
ISO max16,00012,800
Burst15 fps6 fps
4K60 fps15 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight179 g279 g
Battery640 shots330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Pocket 3

140 × 42 × 34 mm

179 g (0.39 lb / 6.31 oz)

XF10

113 × 64 × 41 mm

279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)

Osmo Pocket 3 is 22mm shorter and 8mm thinner than XF10 but it is also 27mm wider.

Osmo Pocket 3 is 100 g lighter than XF10.

Depth (front-to-back): 34mm Osmo Pocket 3 · 41mm XF10

Sensor size, to scale

XF10

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo Pocket 3XF10
Portrait
1.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
4.0Fair✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
1.0Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
3.0Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
4.0Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Pocket 3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.7, 42.2, 33.5

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 200 — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only Osmo Pocket 3 supports it

Reasons to choose

XF10

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only XF10 supports it

Both cameras share

  • Burst (mechanical)Both 6 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Pocket 3

Pros

  • Built-in 3-axis gimbal
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Creator-friendly

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Small sensor vs ILC
  • Accessory dependent

XF10

Pros

  • APS-C in a pocket body
  • 28mm-equivalent lens
  • Very light

Cons

  • No EVF
  • 4K limited to 15p
  • Simpler controls

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Resolution
9.4 MP
24.2 MP2.6× more
Sensor type
1-inch CMOS
APS-C Bayer CMOS
Sensor size
1 inch
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
AF system
Contrast detection AF
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
No
Subject recognition
Human
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
15 fps2.5× more
6 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames6× more
10 frames
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps4× more
15 fps
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps4× more
50 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
None
Codecs
H.264
H.264
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Weight
179 g−100 g less
279 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
139.7 × 42.2 × 33.5 mm
112.5 × 64.4 × 41 mm
Weather sealing
No
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, Osmo Pocket 3 or XF10?

XF10 scores 5.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for Osmo Pocket 3 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10?

Osmo Pocket 3 is 9.4 MP and XF10 is 24.2 MP, so the XF10 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10 have in-body image stabilization?

Osmo Pocket 3 does not have IBIS, while xF10 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Osmo Pocket 3 or the XF10?

Osmo Pocket 3 reaches 15 fps electronic. XF10 reaches 6 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10?

Osmo Pocket 3 weighs 179 g and XF10 weighs 279 g, so the Osmo Pocket 3 is 100 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10 record 4K video?

Osmo Pocket 3: 4K up to 60p. XF10: 4K up to 15p.

Are the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10 weather sealed?

Osmo Pocket 3: No. XF10: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the Osmo Pocket 3 and 330 shots for the XF10, giving the Osmo Pocket 3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Osmo Pocket 3 launched at $519 and XF10 at $499. The XF10 is $20 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.