Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo Pocket 3

DJI

Osmo Pocket 3

Pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch sensor, 4K 120p, and rotating 2-inch OLED screen.

$519

Launch price

Released Oct 2023

vs

Fujifilm

XF10

Pocket APS-C compact with a fixed 28mm-equivalent f/2.8 lens and 24MP Bayer sensor.

$499

Launch price

Released Jul 2018

Osmo Pocket 3 is 5.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

Osmo Pocket 3

Sports & Action

Wins

2categories

XF10

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Pocket 3 wins 4 categories·XF10 wins 1 categories
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 200)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AOsmo Pocket 3 has higher Max video bit rate (130 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • BXF10 has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo Pocket 3XF10
Resolution9.4 MP24.2 MP
Sensor13.2 × 8.8 mmAPS-C
ISO max6,40012,800
4K60 fps15 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight179 g279 g
Burst6 fps
Battery330 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Pocket 3 front view

Osmo Pocket 3

34 × 140 × 42 mm

179 g (0.39 lb / 6.31 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

XF10

113 × 64 × 41 mm

279 g (0.62 lb / 9.84 oz)

Osmo Pocket 3 is 79mm narrower than XF10 but it is also 75mm taller and 1mm thicker.

Osmo Pocket 3 is 100 g lighter than XF10.

Depth (front-to-back): 42mm Osmo Pocket 3 · 41mm XF10

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Osmo Pocket 3 back view

Osmo Pocket 3

34 × 140 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

XF10

113 × 64 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Osmo Pocket 3 top view

Osmo Pocket 3

34 × 42 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

XF10

113 × 41 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Osmo Pocket 3

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

XF10

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

3.2× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo Pocket 3XF10
Portrait
1.0Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
1.0Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
3.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
1.0Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Pocket 3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 33.5, 139.7, 42.2

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 200 — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    130 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • Weight

    179 g vs 279 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

XF10

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.5, 64.4, 41

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Resolution

    24.2 MP vs 9.4 MP — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    12,800 vs 6,400 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only XF10 supports it

Both cameras share

  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi
  • BluetoothBoth support bluetooth

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Pocket 3

Pros

  • Built-in 3-axis gimbal
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Creator-friendly

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Small sensor vs ILC
  • Accessory dependent

XF10

Pros

  • APS-C in a pocket body
  • 28mm-equivalent lens
  • Very light

Cons

  • No EVF
  • 4K limited to 15p
  • Simpler controls

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Resolution
9.4 MP
24.2 MP2.6× more
Sensor type
1-inch CMOS
APS-C Bayer CMOS
Sensor size
13.2 × 8.8 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Aperture
f/2.0
f/2.8
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
20 mm
28 mm
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Processor
Image processor
Fujifilm image processor
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
ISO min (native)
50−150 less
200
ISO max (native)
6,400
12,800+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
16,000
51,200
Osmo Pocket 3
XF10
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Leaf Shutter + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/8000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, Osmo Pocket 3 or XF10?

XF10 scores 5.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for Osmo Pocket 3 — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10?

Osmo Pocket 3 is 9.4 MP and XF10 is 24.2 MP, so the XF10 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10?

Osmo Pocket 3 uses a 3-axis mechanical gimbal, while XF10 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10?

Osmo Pocket 3 weighs 179 g and XF10 weighs 279 g, so the Osmo Pocket 3 is 100 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10 record 4K video?

Osmo Pocket 3: 4K up to 60p. XF10: 4K up to 15p.

Are the Osmo Pocket 3 and XF10 weather sealed?

Osmo Pocket 3: No. XF10: No.

How much does each cost?

Osmo Pocket 3 launched at $519 and XF10 at $499. The XF10 is $20 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo Pocket 3 vs XF10 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and Fujifilm press materials.