DJI
Osmo Pocket 4P
Dual-lens pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch wide and 1/1.28-inch tele sensors, 37MP stills, 4K/240fps slow motion, 103GB built-in storage, and 210-min battery.
—
Launch priceReleased Jun 2026
Panasonic
Lumix FZ2500
1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Sep 2016
Osmo Pocket 4P is 9.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
Osmo Pocket 4P
Wins
Lumix FZ2500
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AOsmo Pocket 4P has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AOsmo Pocket 4P has lower Weight (230 g vs 966 g)
- AOsmo Pocket 4P has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 60 fps)
- AOsmo Pocket 4P has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 125)
- AOsmo Pocket 4P has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 12,800)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
Osmo Pocket 4P
34 × 160 × 63 mm
230 g (0.51 lb / 8.11 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Lumix FZ2500
138 × 102 × 135 mm
966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)
Osmo Pocket 4P is 104mm narrower and 71mm thinner than Lumix FZ2500 but it is also 58mm taller.
Osmo Pocket 4P is 736 g lighter than Lumix FZ2500.
Depth (front-to-back): 63mm Osmo Pocket 4P · 135mm Lumix FZ2500
Sensor size, to scale
Osmo Pocket 4P
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
Lumix FZ2500
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Osmo Pocket 4P
Codecs
Adds HEVC
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 33.5, 159.5, 63.3
Card types
Adds microSD
Weight
230 g vs 966 g — lower is better
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
ISO min (native)
50 vs 125 — lower is better
ISO max (native)
25,600 vs 12,800 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Lumix FZ2500
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Face, Eye…
Codecs
Adds H.264, MOV, MP4…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
Eye AF
Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it
Animal / bird AF
Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it
Microphone jack (3.5mm)
Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it
Headphone jack (3.5mm)
Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Osmo Pocket 4P
Pros
- ✓Dual 20mm + 60mm equivalent lenses
- ✓4K/240fps wide-lens slow motion
- ✓37MP stills with 9x photo zoom
- ✓103GB built-in storage + 1TB microSD
Cons
- –No weathersealing
- –Fixed dual-lens system
- –Price not yet listed on DJI specs page
Lumix FZ2500
Pros
- ✓20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
- ✓Built-in ND filter
- ✓Strong 4K video
- ✓Mic and headphone jacks
Cons
- –Large bridge body
- –1-inch sensor
- –Older AF
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix FZ2500 at major authorized retailers.
DJI Osmo Pocket 4P
Panasonic Lumix FZ2500
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, Osmo Pocket 4P or Lumix FZ2500?
Osmo Pocket 4P scores 6.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — 3-axis mechanical gimbal — cinema-smooth footage in motion.
What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix FZ2500?
Osmo Pocket 4P is 37 MP and Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP, so the Osmo Pocket 4P captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
How does stabilization compare between the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix FZ2500?
Osmo Pocket 4P uses a 3-axis mechanical gimbal, while Lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS.
What's the weight difference between the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix FZ2500?
Osmo Pocket 4P weighs 230 g and Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g, so the Osmo Pocket 4P is 736 g lighter.
Do the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix FZ2500 record 4K video?
Osmo Pocket 4P: 4K up to 60p. Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p.
Are the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix FZ2500 weather sealed?
Osmo Pocket 4P: No. Lumix FZ2500: No.
How much does the Lumix FZ2500 cost?
Lumix FZ2500 launched at $1,199.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo Pocket 4P vs Lumix FZ2500 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of DJI and Panasonic press materials.