Fujifilm
GFX ETERNA 55
G-mount large-format cinema camera with a 102MP GFX sensor, 8K recording, variable ND, 12G-SDI, and pro I/O.
$16,499
Launch priceReleased Sep 2025
Fujifilm
X-H2
40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Sep 2022
GFX ETERNA 55 is 3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GFX ETERNA 55
Wins
X-H2
5 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BX-H2 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
- BX-H2 has lower ISO min (native) (125 vs 400)
- BX-H2 has lower Weight (660 g vs 2000 g)
- AGFX ETERNA 55 has higher Resolution (102 MP vs 40.2 MP)
- AGFX ETERNA 55 has higher Card slots (3 vs 2)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareGFX ETERNA 55
111 × 138 × 177 mm
2000 g (4.41 lb / 70.55 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-H2
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
GFX ETERNA 55 is 26mm narrower than X-H2 but it is also 45mm taller and 92mm thicker.
GFX ETERNA 55 is 1340 g heavier than X-H2.
Depth (front-to-back): 177mm GFX ETERNA 55 · 85mm X-H2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
GFX ETERNA 55
111 × 138 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H2
136 × 93 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
GFX ETERNA 55
111 × 177 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H2
136 × 85 mm
Sensor size, to scale
GFX ETERNA 55
43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format
1441 mm² area
X-H2
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
3.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
GFX ETERNA 55: mount data unavailable
X-H2
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
GFX ETERNA 55
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 110.8, 138.2, 176.8
Resolution
102 MP vs 40.2 MP — higher is better
Card slots
3 vs 2 — higher is better
Card types
Adds SSD via USB
Subject recognition
Adds Face
Reasons to choose
X-H2
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -3.7 EV — lower is better
IBIS effectiveness
7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
ISO min (native)
125 vs 400 — lower is better
Weight
660 g vs 2000 g — lower is better
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Only X-H2 supports it
Internal RAW video
Only X-H2 supports it
In-body stabilization (IBIS)
Only X-H2 supports it
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 12,800
- ✓AF points / zones — Both 425
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GFX ETERNA 55
Pros
- ✓Large-format 8K cinema capture
- ✓Electronic variable ND
- ✓12G-SDI and GenLock
- ✓F-Log2 / F-Log2 C
Cons
- –Cinema-only body
- –Very expensive
- –Large and heavy
X-H2
Pros
- ✓40MP APS-C
- ✓8K video
- ✓IBIS
Cons
- –APS-C
- –Large files
- –Complex video modes
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GFX ETERNA 55 and X-H2 at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GFX ETERNA 55
Fujifilm X-H2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for wildlife, GFX ETERNA 55 or X-H2?
X-H2 scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for GFX ETERNA 55 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.
What's the resolution difference between the GFX ETERNA 55 and X-H2?
GFX ETERNA 55 is 102 MP and X-H2 is 40.2 MP, so the GFX ETERNA 55 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the GFX ETERNA 55 and X-H2 have in-body image stabilization?
GFX ETERNA 55 does not have IBIS, while X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
What's the weight difference between the GFX ETERNA 55 and X-H2?
GFX ETERNA 55 weighs 2000 g and X-H2 weighs 660 g, so the X-H2 is 1340 g lighter.
Do the GFX ETERNA 55 and X-H2 record 4K video?
GFX ETERNA 55: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the GFX ETERNA 55 and X-H2 weather sealed?
GFX ETERNA 55: Yes. X-H2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the GFX ETERNA 55 and 540 shots for the X-H2, giving the X-H2 the edge.
How much does each cost?
GFX ETERNA 55 launched at $16,499 and X-H2 at $1,999. The X-H2 is $14,500 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way GFX ETERNA 55 vs X-H2 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Fujifilm press materials.