Fujifilm
X100F
Fourth-generation X100 with 24MP X-Trans III, hybrid viewfinder, and fixed 35mm-equivalent lens.
$1,299
Released Jan 2017
Ricoh
GR IV
Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.
$1,499
Released Jan 2026
GR IV is 8.9 years newer.
Wins
X100F
Wins
GR IV
1 categories tied
TL;DR — Key differences
- BGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 12,800)
- AX100F has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
- BGR IV has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
- AX100F has higher Burst (mechanical) (8 fps vs 4 fps)
- AX100F has higher Burst (electronic) (8 fps vs 4 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
X100F
127 × 75 × 52 mm
469 g (1.03 lb / 16.54 oz)
GR IV
109 × 61 × 33 mm
262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)
X100F is 17mm wider, 14mm taller, and 20mm thicker than GR IV.
X100F is 207 g heavier than GR IV.
Depth (front-to-back): 52mm X100F · 33mm GR IV
Sensor size, to scale
X100F
23.6 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
368 mm² area
GR IV
23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C
361 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
X100F
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Codecs
Adds H.264
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 126.5, 74.8, 52.4
Card types
Adds SD UHS-I
AF points / zones
425 vs 49 — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
8 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
8 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better
Microphone jack (3.5mm)
Only X100F supports it
Reasons to choose
GR IV
Subject recognition
Adds Face, Eye
Codecs
Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7
Card types
Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I
ISO max (native)
204,800 vs 12,800 — higher is better
ISO min (native)
100 vs 200 — lower is better
In-body stabilization
Only GR IV supports it
Weight
262 g vs 469 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
X100F
Pros
- ✓Hybrid viewfinder
- ✓24MP X-Trans III
- ✓Leaf shutter
- ✓Compact street camera
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No IBIS
- –No 4K
GR IV
Pros
- ✓25.74MP APS-C sensor
- ✓5-axis sensor-shift SR
- ✓53GB internal memory
- ✓Pocketable 28mm GR lens
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –No built-in EVF
- –Full HD video only
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for vlogging, X100F or GR IV?
GR IV scores 6.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for X100F — 262g — easy to handhold for selfie video.
What's the resolution difference between the X100F and GR IV?
X100F is 24.3 MP and GR IV is 25.74 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the X100F and GR IV have in-body image stabilization?
X100F does not have IBIS, while gR IV has in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the X100F or the GR IV?
X100F reaches 8 fps electronic. GR IV reaches 4 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the X100F and GR IV?
X100F weighs 469 g and GR IV weighs 262 g, so the GR IV is 207 g lighter.
Do the X100F and GR IV record 4K video?
X100F: Full HD. GR IV: 4K up to 60p.
Are the X100F and GR IV weather sealed?
X100F: No. GR IV: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 390 shots (CIPA) for the X100F and 250 shots for the GR IV, giving the X100F the edge.
How much does each cost?
X100F launched at $1,299 and GR IV at $1,499. The X100F is $200 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.