Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X100V

Previous-gen fixed 23mm f/2 street camera — still hugely popular and hard to find.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Feb 2020

vs

Panasonic

Lumix FZ2500

1-inch bridge camera with 20x Leica zoom, built-in ND filter, and advanced 4K video tools.

$1,199

Launch price

Released Sep 2016

X100V is 3.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

X100V

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

5categories

Lumix FZ2500

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X100V wins 4 categories·Lumix FZ2500 wins 1 categories
  • AX100V has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 49)
  • AX100V has lower Weight (478 g vs 966 g)
  • BLumix FZ2500 has higher Burst (electronic) (50 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AX100V has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AX100V has higher Resolution (26.1 MP vs 20.1 MP)

Key specs at a glance

X100VLumix FZ2500
Resolution26.1 MP20.1 MP
SensorAPS-C13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst30 fps50 fps
4K30 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight478 g966 g
Battery350 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X100V

128 × 75 × 53 mm

478 g (1.05 lb / 16.86 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix FZ2500

138 × 102 × 135 mm

966 g (2.13 lb / 34.07 oz)

X100V is 10mm narrower, 27mm shorter, and 81mm thinner than Lumix FZ2500.

X100V is 488 g lighter than Lumix FZ2500.

Depth (front-to-back): 53mm X100V · 135mm Lumix FZ2500

Sensor size, to scale

X100V

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Lumix FZ2500

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

3.2× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX100VLumix FZ2500
Portrait
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
7.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
3.0Limited✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Vlogging
5.0Fair
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X100V

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128, 74.8, 53.3

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 49 — higher is better

  • Weight

    478 g vs 966 g — lower is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only X100V supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only X100V supports it

  • Bluetooth

    Only X100V supports it

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix FZ2500

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 137.6, 101.9, 134.7

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MP4, AVCHD

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it

  • Headphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only Lumix FZ2500 supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    50 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    125 vs 160 — lower is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    20 frames vs 17 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 30 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 200 Mbps
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 350 shots

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X100V

Pros

  • Classic design
  • Leaf shutter
  • Film simulations
  • Proven street camera

Cons

  • Superseded by X100VI
  • Fixed lens
  • No IBIS

Lumix FZ2500

Pros

  • 20x 26-520mm equivalent zoom
  • Built-in ND filter
  • Strong 4K video
  • Mic and headphone jacks

Cons

  • Large bridge body
  • 1-inch sensor
  • Older AF

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X100V and Lumix FZ2500 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X100V
Lumix FZ2500
Resolution
26.1 MP+30%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
X100V
Lumix FZ2500
Aperture
f/2.0
f/2.8-4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
35 mm
26-520 mm
X100V
Lumix FZ2500
Processor
X-Processor 4
Venus Engine
X100V
Lumix FZ2500
ISO min (native)
160
125−35 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
25,600
X100V
Lumix FZ2500
Shutter type
Lens Shutter + Electronic
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, X100V or Lumix FZ2500?

X100V scores 7.0/10 versus 2.0/10 for Lumix FZ2500 — 478g — ultralight for all-day carry.

What's the resolution difference between the X100V and Lumix FZ2500?

X100V is 26.1 MP and Lumix FZ2500 is 20.1 MP, so the X100V captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the X100V and Lumix FZ2500?

X100V does not have IBIS, while Lumix FZ2500 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X100V or the Lumix FZ2500?

X100V reaches 30 fps electronic. Lumix FZ2500 reaches 50 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X100V and Lumix FZ2500?

X100V weighs 478 g and Lumix FZ2500 weighs 966 g, so the X100V is 488 g lighter.

Do the X100V and Lumix FZ2500 record 4K video?

X100V: 4K up to 30p. Lumix FZ2500: 4K up to 30p.

Are the X100V and Lumix FZ2500 weather sealed?

X100V: Yes. Lumix FZ2500: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the X100V and 350 shots for the Lumix FZ2500, giving the Lumix FZ2500 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X100V launched at $1,399 and Lumix FZ2500 at $1,199. The Lumix FZ2500 is $200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X100V vs Lumix FZ2500 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.